A webinar from CREDS and Buildings & Cities
There is a large gulf between current slow retrofitting rates and the portion of domestic buildings that rapidly need intervention to meet climate targets. This webinar reflects on key findings from a recent Buildings & Cities special issue which begins to address the gap by focusing on delivering retrofit at scale. Co-hosted with the Centre for Research into Energy Demand Solutions (CREDS). Registration: https://bit.ly/3DCrfrJ
Welcome Nick Eyre, Director of CREDS &
University of Oxford
Introduction to the Special Issue, Faye Wade, University of Edinburgh
Retrofitting at scale: comparing transition experiments in
Scotland and the Netherlands, Petra Hofman, Tilburg University, NL & Faye Wade, University of Edinburgh, UK
Housing retrofit: six types of local authority energy service
models, Jan Webb MBE, University of Edinburgh, UK
Discussant: Erwin Mlecnik, TU Delft, NL
Domestic retrofit supply chain initiatives and business
innovations: an international review, Joanne Wade OBE, The Association for Decentralised
Energy and Chair of the Advisory Board for CREDS, UK
Domestic retrofit: understanding capabilities of micro-enterprise
building practitioners, Kate Simpson, Imperial College London, UK
Discussant: Veronika Schröpfer, Architects’ Council of Europe, BE
Lord Deben, Chair, Climate Change Committee, UK
Stefan Moser, European Commission, DG ENERGY, Head of Unit: Buildings and Products (ENER.B.3)
Chaired by Richard Lorch, Editor in Chief, Buildings & Cities
Domestic buildings account for 24% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (Lucon et al., 2014), and the vast majority of existing buildings are likely to still be in use in 2050. Consequently, retrofitting domestic buildings is essential for meeting targets to mitigate the catastrophic impacts of our changing climate. Retrofitting includes a combination of improving the building fabric to reduce the need for heating and cooling, and changing building services (heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity) to carbon free systems.The International Energy Agency (IEA) have indicated that one in five buildings worldwide need to be retrofitted to be zero carbon ready by 2030 (IEA, 2021). However, current rates of retrofitting are far lower than necessary for achieving global net zero climate targets. For example, across the EU, deep retrofits that reduce energy consumption by at least 60% are carried out in only 0.2% of the building stock per year and in some regions, energy retrofitting is virtually absent (EC, 2020).
Successful retrofitting will only be achieved through aligning political, economic, social and technical systems. Policy and governance, in particular, can provide appropriate conditions for mass retrofit. Central governments have the capacity to create and implement targets, tools and financial support, but retrofitting schemes customised to local circumstances can be more successful than nation-wide strategies (Gillich, et al., 2018). However, there is uncertainty around the capacity of local schemes to be scaled up. Additionally, successful energy retrofitting will require a ‘house as a system’ approach (Stanislas et al., 2011), which recognises the building envelope as a single thermal unit (Clarke et al., 2017). The Repair, Maintenance and Improvement (RMI) sector currently undertakes the majority of domestic renovation work (e.g. extensions, kitchen and bathroom refurbishments), and would be well positioned to contribute to scaling energy retrofitting. However, the sector is currently characterised by fragmentation and skill sets restricted according to discipline or technology. There are still unanswered questions around how such actors can be supported to develop supply chains for retrofitting at scale.
Clarke, L., Gleeson, C., & Winch, C. (2017). What kind of expertise is needed for low energy construction? Construction Management and Economics, 35(3), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1248988
EC, (2020). A renovation wave of Europe, Greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives. European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/renovation-wave_en
Gillich, A., Sunikka-Blank, M., & Ford, A. (2018). Designing an ‘optimal’ domestic retrofit programme. Building Research and Information, 46(7), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1368235
IEA, (2021). Net zero by 2050 hinges on a global push to increase energy efficiency. International Energy Agency. Published: 10 June 2021. Available at: https://www.iea.org/articles/net-zero-by-2050-hinges-on-a-global-push-to-increase-energy-efficiency
Lucon O., D. Ürge-Vorsatz, A. Zain Ahmed, H. Akbari, P. Bertoldi, L. F. Cabeza, N. Eyre, A. Gadgil, L. D. D. Harvey, Y. Jiang, E. Liphoto, S. Mirasgedis, S. Murakami, J. Parikh, C. Pyke, and M. V. Vilariño, (2014). Buildings. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
Stanislas, N., Janda, K. B., & Killip, G. (2011). Building expertise: A system of professions approach to low-carbon refurbishment in the UK and France. Proceedings of ECEEE 2011 Summer Study - Belambra Presquile de Giens, France
Heat stress: adaptation measures in South African informal settlements
J M Hugo
The urban expansion of Berlin, 1862–1900: Hobrecht’s Plan
F Bentlin
Common sources of occupant dissatisfaction with workspace environments in 600 office buildings
T Parkinson, S Schiavon, J Kim & G Betti
Urban growth in peri- urban, rural and urban areas: Mexico City
G M Cruz-Bello, J M Galeana-Pizaña & S González-Arellano
Overcoming the incumbency and barriers to sustainable cooling
J Lizana, N D Miranda, L Gross, A Mazzone, F Cohen, G Palafox-Alcantar, P Fahr, A Jani, R Renaldi, M Mcculloch & R Khosla
Assessing climate action progress of the City of Toronto
K R Slater, J Ventura, J B Robinson, C Fernandez, S Dutfield & L King
Meeting urban GHG reduction goals with waste diversion: multi-residential buildings
V MacLaren, E Ikiz & E Alfred
Climate action in urban mobility: personal and political transformations
G Hochachka, K G Logan, J Raymond & W Mérida
Transformational climate action at the city scale: comparative South–North perspectives
D Simon, R Bellinson & W Smit
Stretching or conforming? Financing urban climate change adaptation in Copenhagen
S Whittaker & K Jespersen
Embodied carbon emissions in buildings: explanations, interpretations, recommendations
T Lützkendorf & M Balouktsi
Pathways to improving the school stock of England towards net zero
D Godoy-Shimizu, S M Hong, I Korolija, Y Schwartz, A Mavrogianni & D Mumovic
Urban encroachment in ecologically sensitive areas: drivers, impediments and consequences
M H Andreasen, J Agergaard, R Y Kofie, L Møller-Jensen & M Oteng-Ababio
Towards sufficiency and solidarity: COP27 implications for construction and property
D Ness
Local decarbonisation opportunities and barriers: UK public procurement legislation
K Sugar, T M Mose, C Nolden, M Davis, N Eyre, A Sanchez-Graells & D Van Der Horst
Integrating climate change and urban regeneration: success stories from Seoul
J Song & B Müller
Canadian cities: climate change action and plans
Y Herbert, A Dale & C Stashok
Energy, emerging technologies and gender in homes [editorial]
Y Strengers, K Gram-Hanssen, K Dahlgren & L Aagaard
Latest Commentaries
Dismantling Power and Bringing Reflexivity into the Eco-modern Home
Can renewable and smart energy technologies in the home avoid negative consequences for gender, power, and nature-society relations within the domestic sphere? Olufolahan Osunmuyiwa, Helene Ahlborg, Martin Hultman, Kavya Michael and Anna Åberg comment on ‘Masculine roles and practices in homes with photovoltaic systems’ (Mechlenborg & Gram-Hanssen, 2022) – published in a recent Buildings & Cities special issue ‘Energy, Emerging Tech and Gender in Homes’.
The Launch of SURGe at COP27: Breakthrough or Déjà Vu?
The overall outcomes of COP27 (held in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt) have been reported by some as disappointing. However, leading city networks such as C40 and ICLEI claim that subnational governments and cities have made a significant breakthrough with the launch of the Sustainable Urban Resilience for the Next Generation initiative (SURGe). This commentary explores how much of a breakthrough this really is.