www.buildingsandcities.org/about/metrics.html
Journal Metrics
Downloads and views
Combined full-text views and downloads of peer-reviewed content on https://journal-buildingscities.org/: 523,612 (2024)
Journal evaluation and impact
Scopus Citescore for 2023: 5.4
- #17/189 in Engineering: Architecture (91st percentile = Q1)
- #45/279 in Social Sciences: Urban Studies (82nd percentile = Q1)
- #141/821 in Social Sciences: Geography, Planning and Development (82nd percentile = Q1)
- #51/223 in Engineering: Building and Construction (77th percentile = Q1)
- #54/219 in Environmental Science (miscellaneous) (75th percentile = Q1)
- #115/399 in Environmental Science: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (71st percentile = Q2)
Scimago h-index: 17 (2023)
Scimago Journal Rank: 0.817 (2023) (Q1; ranked 9th out of 169)
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ): Seal of Approval
Finnish Publication Forum (JUFO): level 2
Content metrics
| Peer-reviewed content in the 2024 volume: | |
|---|---|
| Submissions received 1 | 103 |
| Reviews requested 2 | 562 |
| Reviews received 3 | 203 |
| Total Rejections 4 | 51 |
| Acceptances 5 | 44 |
| Acceptance rate 6 | 46% |
| Peer-reviewed papers - Time to publication in 2024: | |
|---|---|
| Time from submission to first decision 7 | 59 days (2 months) |
| Time from submission to acceptance 8 | 140 days (4.6 months) |
Definitions
1 Number of new articles received by the journal ↩
2 Number of peer review invitation emails that were sent out ↩
3 Number of completed peer review reports received ↩
4 Total number of articles rejected (including desk rejects) ↩
5 Number of articles that received a 'Accept for publication' decision ↩
6 Number of acceptances, as a percentage, against the total number of final decisions ↩
7 'Mean' average from submission to first decision for all publications in the volume ↩
8 'Mean' average from submission to acceptance for all publications in the volume (includes revision & second review) ↩
Latest Commentaries
Self-Organised Knowledge Space as a Living Lab
While Living Labs are often framed as structured, institutionalised spaces for innovation, Sadia Sharmin (Habitat Forum Berlin) reinterprets the concept through the lens of grassroots urban practices. She argues that self-organised knowledge spaces can function as Living Labs by fostering situated learning, collective agency, and community resilience. The example of a Living Lab in Bangladesh provides a model pathway to civic participation and spatial justice.
Climate Mitigation & Carbon Budgets: Research Challenges
Thomas Lützkendorf (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) explains how the research community has helped to change the climate change policy landscape for the construction and real estate sectors, particularly for mitigating GHG emissions. Evidence can be used to influence policy pathways and carbon budgets, and to develop detailed carbon strategies and implementation. A key challenge is to create a stronger connection between the requirements for individual buildings and the national reduction pathways for the built environment.