Which combination of policy measures are most appropriate for reducing urban emissions? New peer-reviewed research shows how economic, technology and urban building energy models can be combined and used to evaluate policy efficacy.
Until now, uncertainties of
economic and market-driven factors in urban building energy models (UBEM) have
been a challenge for building energy modellers. The spatial impact of energy
and emissions policies in urban environments is often hard to determine. UBEMs
often fail to recognise the financial and social influences over new buildings
and/ or retrofitting existing building stocks. In INTEGRATION OF AN ENERGY-ECONOMY MODEL WITH AN URBAN ENERGY MODEL, Lu et al. present a new
approach for integrating these different types of model. Specifically, the
authors integrate outputs from a spatial economic model with a spatially
explicit community-level UBEM. This is a major contribution in the development
of an integrated modelling approach, but also in quantifying the co-benefits of
multi-scale effects of energy and emission reduction policies.
Lu et al. adopt a ‘sandbox’ approach to simulate urban form and building retrofit policies, working at a neighbourhood scale. The sandbox represents a particular urban form, including population density, street pattern, block size and land-use proportions, all derived from a real neighbourhood. This allows for an increasingly realistic representation of the integrated processes that influence energy-usage and emissions output, including fuel choice, building design, mechanical systems, urban form and behaviour.
With this combination, the researchers have been able to model the evolution of a neighbourhood’s individual buildings (HVAC system and the building shell) over time. This provides a much higher level of granularity than many existing efforts to understand how building stock changes over time in response to different policy strategies. The interaction between building technology policies and different urban growth-management strategies can be better understood and harnessed. Policy makers are afforded extremely valuable and detailed insights into the impact of energy policies at an individual building-level, prior to their implementation. Insights arising from this combined model will assist practitioners involved in both city planning and energy management.
A case study applies the model to the Sunset region of Vancouver, Canada. The case study explored three urban-form policy experiments: dispersed, commercial corridor, and transportation-oriented development (TOD). The analysis illustrates the combined results of a technology policy regulating a shift towards electrification and a spatial urban form densification policy. The authors identify specific growth-management strategies that can be more effective for reducing emissions than when integrated with other urban form strategies.
Policies focused on energy
and emissions standards for new buildings will be relatively more effective in
areas with a growth-management strategy that necessitates the redevelopment of
many existing buildings. This demonstrates a useful approach for understanding
exactly which policy instruments, such as densification, higher building energy
standards, and fuel switching, will bring the most emissions reductions.
The research was funded by Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (PICS). Additional funding from Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) Canada and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) supported tool development and related research.
Suburban climate adaptation governance: assumptions and imaginaries affecting peripheral municipalities
L Cerrada Morato
Urban shrinkage as a catalyst for transformative adaptation
L Mabon, M Sato & N Mabon
Maintaining a city against nature: climate adaptation in Beira
J Schubert
Ventilation regulations and occupant practices: undetectable pollution and invisible extraction
J Few, M Shipworth & C Elwell
Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar
How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang
Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow
Gender and the heat pump transition
J Crawley, F Wade & M de Wilde
Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson
Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka
Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves
European building passports: developments, challenges and future roles
M Buchholz & T Lützkendorf
Decision-support for selecting demolition waste management strategies
M van den Berg, L Hulsbeek & H Voordijk
Assessing social value in housing design: contributions of the capability approach
J-C Dissart & L Ricaurte
Electricity consumption in commercial buildings during Covid-19
G P Duggan, P Bauleo, M Authier, P A Aloise-Young, J Care & D Zimmerle
Disruptive data: historicising the platformisation of Dublin’s taxi industry
J White & S Larsson
Impact of 2050 tree shading strategies on building cooling demands
A Czekajlo, J Alva, J Szeto, C Girling & R Kellett
Social values and social infrastructures: a multi-perspective approach to place
A Legeby & C Pech
Resilience of racialized segregation is an ecological factor: Baltimore case study
S T A Pickett, J M Grove, C G Boone & G L Buckley
Latest Commentaries
The Data Politics of Tech Corporations
Dillon Mahmoudi (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) and Alan Wiig (University of Florida) comment on the contributions of the Buildings & Cities special issue Data Politics in the Built Environment. This commentary considers how tech corporates such as Amazon are changing urban life and creating new forms of automated surveillance.
Phronesis and Epistemic Justice in Data-Driven Built Environments
Miguel Valdez (Open University) comments on the contributions of the Buildings & Cities special issue Data Politics in the Built Environment. This commentary considers an additional perspective and provides an additional foundation to support more progressive data politics in the built environment. The three Aristotelian virtues of ‘techne’, ‘episteme’ and ‘phronesis’ and epistemic justice provide suitable lenses to critique smart city politics.