
www.buildingsandcities.org/insights/news/built-environment-education.html
Join us for the launch of the B&C special issue "Education & Training: Mainstreaming Zero Carbon"
Two virtual events will discuss aspects of the special issue and what can be done to accelerate the transformations needed in built environment education. What are some key barriers and opportunities?
Key questions for discussion are likely to include:
• Who should take the lead on creating this change?
• How should professional institutions plan to reframe its higher education training?
• What kinds of changes are needed to the built environment curricula?
• What is your organisation's specific plan for doing so?
The climate emergency requires that the built environment will have to be zero carbon. All new buildings must be zero carbon by 2025 and the existing building stock will require significant retrofitting to be carbon neutral by 2050. A whole-life interdisciplinary approach is essential, which will require mainstreaming decarbonisation skills in all the built environment professions.
Education and training are key for ensuring the professions can achieve this. How will the current higher education curricula adequately meet the challenge and what can be done to positively plan for the future? In November 2020, Buildings & Cities (B&C) published a special issue Education and Training: Mainstreaming Zero Carbon, guest edited by Fionn Stevenson and Alison Kwok. All papers are free to access.
The special issue raised three challenges:
• How can education and training be rapidly changed to ensure the
creation of zero-carbon built environments?
• How can this transition be implemented successfully?
• What positive examples and models can be drawn upon or
adapted?
Two regional virtual events (respectively with The Edge and Carbon Leadership Forum) will use the themes and challenges from the special issue to discuss a rapid change agenda for built environment education. Each will be seeking solutions that are top-down as well as bottom- up and look for a new range of interdependent processes to occur across:
• Central government
• Accreditation bodies and Professional institutes
• Universities
• NGOs
Monday 1st February 2021, 17.00 - 18.30 Greenwich Mean Time
To attend this event please register in advance at: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/zero-carbon-can-uk-built-environment-education-deliver-tickets-135982089089
Chair:Bill Gething (University of the West of England)
Introduction:Fionn Stevenson (University of Sheffield) and Alison Kwok (University of Oregon)
Speakers:Gavin Killip (University of Oxford)
Katy Janda (University College London)
Malini Srivastava (University of Minnesota)
David Gloster (Director of Education, Royal Institute of British Architects)
Lynne Jack (Heriot Watt University & Past President, Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers)
Q&A
Monday 8 February 2021, 9.00-10.00 Pacific Standard Time (PST)
To attend this event please register in advance at: https://washington.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJIpdOmurD0sGdCUb1aZspg9CEVadmCN6R1K
Anthony Hickling (Carbon Leadership Forum)
Introduction:Fionn Stevenson (University of Sheffield) and Alison Kwok (University of Oregon)
Speakers:Gavin Killip (University of Oxford)
Katy Janda (University College London)
Malini Srivastava (University of Minnesota)
Marsha Maytum (Practitioner, Educator, 2019 chair of AIA COTE - American Institute of Architects, Committee on the Environment)
Steph Carlisle (Carbon Leadership Forum and University of Pennsylvania)
Q&A
Retrofitting Norwegian residential buildings: an archetype-based dynamic stock model
L S A Rousseau, S Amini, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Decolonising time: vernacular villages and the politics of heritage temporality
R Al-Rabady
Commutes to alternative workplaces: GHG emissions and physical activity
J Taylor, L Thoen, A Espinosa Mireles De Villafranca, P Anashin, J Vanhatalo, D Milián
Bernal & I Okkonen
Nine ‘myths’ about the building stock of Great Britain
S Evans, P Steadman, A Neto-Bradley, D Humphrey, R Liddiard,H Shamsi, J Palmer & G Simons
Critical Reconstruction Theory and the invention of post-disaster response
G Lizarralde, D Wachsmuth, F Özdoğan & M Cossu
Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui’s dual disaster recovery
A Y F Urushima & K Yamaguchi
Critical reflections on the process of interdisciplinary building science research
G T Morgan, M F Touchie, J Robinson, A Jakubiec & J Tran
Comparing technical disassembly potential methods for concrete and timber buildings
N Westerholm, A Tuure, S Pajunen & M Kuittinen
One-stop shops as leverage points for renovation sufficiency
G Pardalis & M Sula
Creating resilient cities: advocacy and planning for equity-based recovery
A Paidakaki
Impact of glazed balcony design on daylight in Finnish apartments
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa & S Pelsmakers
Climate-related risks: implications for municipal governments in Brazil
C Nastari Fernandes, P Ciminelli Ramalho & F Lima-Silva
Changing land-use metrics in mass housing: Türkiye case study
M S Çepni, A K Kutluca, T Salihoğlu, A Atmaca & S Mintemur
Personal comfort systems for adults with intellectual disabilities
K Exss, M Trebilcock, P Wegertseder-Martínez, S Schiavon & H Zhang
How buildings shape occupant movement: a systematic review and framework
G Chinazzo & N Wang
Rethinking the second life of post-disaster and post-conflict temporary housing
N Akdede, B Ö Ay & İ Gürsel Dino
Embodied carbon impacts of residential development siteworks: new assessment framework
P Comerford, O Kinnane, R O’Hegarty & P Crowe
Horizontal building extensions: potential in Finnish blocks of flats
J Tarpio & P Lehtovuori
Post-disaster reconstruction and ethics: the power of social capital
B Ubesingha, G Ofori, G Agyekum-Mensah & D Frings
Towards net zero: sectoral ambitions and global trends in building decarbonisation
C E Caballero-Güereca, J Vogel, N Alaux, C M Ouellet-Plamondon, J Silva Santana, G Foliente, T Lützkendorf & A Passer
Climate literacy and labour agency in vocational education and training
J Calvert, V Price, C Winch, L Clarke, M Sahin-Dikmen, P-L Bilodeau & E Dionne
Towards a new neighbourhood-scale climate risk-adaptation approach
C Rigoni, S Oliveira, O Romice, A Moreno-Rangel & A Chatzimichali
Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks
C Foulds, S Royston, A Aggeli, A Crowther & R Robison
Environmental impacts of reclaimed bricks: comparing different deconstruction methods
E Salmio & S Huuhka
eCOMBINE: framework for energy, comfort, behaviour and a multi-domain environment
V M Barthelmes, C Karmann, V Gonzalez Serrano, K Lyu, J Wienold, M Andersen, D Licina & D Khovalyg
Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N Antaki, D Petrescu & V Marin

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
Disaster Reconstruction: Practitioner Insights Improve Outcomes
Regan Potangaroa (Auckland University of Technology - AUT), Kelvin Zuo (Massey University), Suzanne Wilkinson (AUT) explain why experience-led knowledge from the field, when triangulated with contemporaneous documentation, can constitute evidence for understanding post-disaster reconstruction systems. People working within reconstruction environments (engineers, builders, logisticians and community actors) provide crucial observations about how reconstruction systems function in practice, particularly supply chains, material flows, procurement and governance in post-disaster rebuilding. Integrating this knowledge can lead to better outcomes.
Preparedness for Recovery
Kristen MacAskill (University of Cambridge) and Lianne Dalziel (University of Canterbury) explain capabilities (and the associated capacity) are essential for preparedness. Capacity for both physical infrastructure and organisational / institutional response are necessary. This commentary focuses primarily on institutional capacity for disaster risk management, and the positive (if slow) developments in the value that is being placed on preparedness.