www.buildingsandcities.org/insights/news/carbon-metrics-videos.html
Carbon Metrics - videos
Watch the Climate Metrics presentations discussing approaches to measuring and managing mitigation in the built environment. From the special issue launch event at the "Beyond 2020" conference.
Can appropriate carbon metrics in combination with carbon budgets be developed and used by built environment professionals, clients and civil society? Is it feasible to have a scalable approach? Can governments provide clear, useful targets to the products / construction / real estate industries? Based on research in a just published Buildings & Cities special issue on Carbon Metrics, new findings are presented. An overview introduces latest developments in global warming indicators and potential applications at building and city levels.
The credibility and use of carbon metrics depend on improved transparency, accuracy and data quality. Clear targets and benchmarks based on a scientific carbon budget can provide clarity to the many supply- and demand-side actors and can be used to establish requirements for individual projects as well as larger strategic plans . The creation and integration of target values for the built environment into decision making will need to involve a multi-scale and multi-actor approach.
Carbon metrics can help to create assessments and how carbon budgets can be used as a target value and/or assessment scale at building, city and building stock levels.
Presentations
- Yamina Saheb - Implications of the Paris Agreement's temperature target
- Thomas Lützkendorf - Carbon metrics & carbon budgets: job sharing
- Marcella Saade - Latest developments in the assessment rules of GHG emissions: biogenic carbon
- Tina Fawcett - Deep retrofit of buildings: the role of carbon metrics
- Maria Balouktsi - Climate action on city level: the production- and consumption-based approach
- Richard Lorch - Reflections and outlook
Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content
Design as communicative activity: implications for sustainability assessment software
T Säwén, A Sasic Kalagasidis & A Hollberg
Indoor temperature and office work performance in a temperate climate
T Kramer & S Schiavon
Moving homes and energy poverty: residents’ concerns, capabilities and responses
M Jalas, J Rinkinen, S Numminen & E Valkealahti
Reference study for biogenic carbon storage in the residential building stock
O Iliescu, I Talvitie, A Amiri & S Junnila
Building space heating and cooling in NDCs 4.0
T P Lützkendorf
Building component reuse as sociomaterial interaction: lessons from precast concrete
J Uusikartano, L Alkki & V Capitani
Validating national reuse indicators from regional demolition data: a Swedish example
F Ericsson, K Mjörnell & U Janson
Climate change risk and decision-making [editorial]
S Foxell & I Cooper
Technologies of reconstruction [editorial]
P Tombesi
Urban form metrics for building occupancy modelling: applications and impacts
D Reiter, M Jehling & R Hecht
Retrofit realism: affordable low-carbon policies for existing homes
N Eyre & R Khosla
Join Our Community
The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
Practitioners’ Views of POE
Post-occupancy evaluation (POE) is widely valued but weakly embedded in practice. Ant Marsh, Kate van Someren, Lara Clarke and Tom Randall (Arup Building Performance and Commissioning Services) explain the findings from a survey and focus groups with UK construction industry practitioners. They identified fragmented responsibility, split commercial incentives and a persistent fear of “bad news”. Making POE routine requires a shift from producing reports to a focus on improving outcomes by owning and acting on learning.
Who is Responsible for Climate Change?
Ian Cooper (Eclipse Research) explores the questions of responsibility raised in the recent Buildings & Cities special issue ‘Climate Change Risk and Decision-Making’. Focusing here on carbon emissions and mitigation, global responses will require grounding in what can work locally. New responsibilities arise for the wide range of built environment decision-makers: clients, professionals and their institutions, central and local governments, product suppliers, financiers, insurers, etc. A framework is needed to manage the complexity of responsibilities especially for variety of actors, the time frames and spatial scales.