
www.buildingsandcities.org/insights/commentaries/hi-res-model.html
By Clare Heaviside (University College London - UCL), Jonathon Taylor (UCL & Tampere U), Oscar Brousse (UCL), Charles Simpson (UCL)
Current and projected temperatures simulated by global climate models are typically output at a coarse resolution of 30-100 km. This is unhelpful for identifying climate-related public health risks in cities. New mapping is needed at higher resolution to better characterize hazards and prepare location-specific adaptation plans.
The range of negative health impacts of exposure to heat is widely researched and acknowledged (Basu, 2009). In the UK, around 2,000 deaths per year are attributed to heat (Hajat et al, 2014). Heat exposure is of particular concern due to: i) global observations of rising temperatures; ii) more frequent heatwaves associated with climate change, and iii) rising urban populations, who are exposed to the urban heat island (UHI) effect (Field et al., 2012; Melorose et al., 2015).
Risk assessments use relationships between ambient temperature and health outcomes such as risk of hospitalization or mortality to estimate health burdens for specific populations, e.g. the fraction of all-cause mortality which can be attributed to heat. By using projected temperatures derived from climate models, it is also possible to assess the potential change in health impacts we might expect in future (Gasparrini et al., 2017). These risk estimates are informative to policy makers for planning health and social care provisions, particularly in anticipation of heatwave events (Public Health England, 2015), or for designing mitigation and adaptation actions to protect health in future.
One source of uncertainty in climate change risk assessment relates to the type and resolution of exposure (temperature) data input to the risk assessment model, for example global-scale climate models are not designed to capture local or regional scale features, due to their coarse resolution (~30-100 km) (Goodess et al., 2021). This has particular importance for the UHI, because global climate model outputs do not represent the urban impact on the local climate, and therefore underestimate population heat exposure, and related public health impacts.
One solution is to use higher resolution climate or
meteorological modelling. This can be computationally expensive and difficult
to set up and run over large areas, but it can be effectively employed for
specific cities or regions to better represent temperatures across urban areas
(e.g. London, Figure 1). Previous simulations using a 1x1 km resolution
meteorological model for Birmingham in the UK estimated that the UHI
contributes up to 40% of heat-related mortality over a summer, (Macintyre & Heaviside, 2019) and up to 50% during a
heatwave (Heaviside et al., 2016). Estimates of heat-related
risks in the future without such highly resolved data might therefore be
underestimated by a half.
Climate change risk assessment models are an important component of local adaptation strategies. They need to be used by policy makers, strategists, planners and stakeholders to assess potential future impacts of climate change, and to develop actions that will reduce risks. Quantitative estimates of societal risk are essential for long term planning, but local and city scale analysis provides necessary detail to reveal the extent to which a population is exposed or is vulnerable to the effects of heat. This vulnerability depends on multiple factors, including local climate, geography, housing and social and economic factors (Macintyre et al., 2018; Taylor et al., 2018).
Additional city-scale modelling and spatial analysis (based
on high-resolution climate modelling) must add demographic data to 1) identify
vulnerable population groups or geographical areas; 2) investigate the impacts
of potential city-level and neighbourhood-level interventions, and 3) reduce health
inequalities and the potential for unintended consequences from adaptation
measures at local scales. This will enable strategists, planners and others in central
and local government to more effectively prepare appropriate adaptation
responses and focus efforts where they can have the greatest benefit to health
and wellbeing, and to society as a whole.
CH is supported by a NERC fellowship (NE/R01440X/1) and acknowledges funding from the Wellcome Trust HEROIC project (216035/Z/19/Z), which funds OB and CS.
Basu, R. (2009). High ambient temperature and mortality: A review of epidemiologic studies from 2001 to 2008. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-8-40
Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L., … Midgley, P. M. (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1-594. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177245
Gasparrini, A., Guo, Y., Sera, F., Vicedo-Cabrera, A. M., Huber, V., Tong, S., … Armstrong, B. (2017). Projections of temperature-related excess mortality under climate change scenarios. The Lancet Planetary Health, 1(9), e360-e367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30156-0
Goodess, C., Berk, S., Ratna, S. B., Brousse, O., Davies, M., Heaviside, C., Moore, C. & Pineo, H. (2021). Climate change projections for sustainable and healthy cities. Buildings and Cities, 2(1), 812-836. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.111
Hajat, S., Vardoulakis, S., Heaviside, C., & Eggen, B. (2014). Climate change effects on human health: Projections of temperature-related mortality for the UK during the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 68(7), 641-648. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-202449
Heaviside, C., Vardoulakis, S., & Cai, X.-M. (2016). Attribution of mortality to the urban heat island during heatwaves in the West Midlands, UK. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0100-9
Macintyre, H. L., & Heaviside, C. (2019). Potential benefits of cool roofs in reducing heat-related mortality during heatwaves in a European city. Environment International, 127, 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2019.02.065
Macintyre, H. L., Heaviside, C., Taylor, J., Picetti, R., Symonds, P., Cai, X.-M., & Vardoulakis, S. (2018). Assessing urban population vulnerability and environmental risks across an urban area during heatwaves - Implications for health protection. Science of the Total Environment, 610-611, 678-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.062
Melorose, J., Perroy, R., & Careas, S. (2015). World population prospects. United Nations, 1(6042), 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Taylor, J., Symonds, P., Wilkinson, P., Heaviside, C., Macintyre, H., Davies, M., … Hutchinson, E. (2018). Estimating the influence of housing energy efficiency and overheating adaptations on heat-related mortality in the West Midlands, UK. Atmosphere, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9050190
Creating resilient cities: advocacy and planning for equity-based recovery
A Paidakaki
Impact of glazed balcony design on daylight in Finnish apartments
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa & S Pelsmakers
Climate-related risks: implications for municipal governments in Brazil
C Nastari Fernandes, P Ciminelli Ramalho & F Lima-Silva
Changing land-use metrics in mass housing: Türkiye case study
M S Çepni, A K Kutluca, T Salihoğlu, A Atmaca & S Mintemur
Personal comfort systems for adults with intellectual disabilities
K Exss, M Trebilcock, P Wegertseder-Martínez, S Schiavon & H Zhang
How buildings shape occupant movement: a systematic review and framework
G Chinazzo & N Wang
Rethinking the second life of post-disaster and post-conflict temporary housing
N Akdede, B Ö Ay & İ Gürsel Dino
Embodied carbon impacts of residential development siteworks: new assessment framework
P Comerford, O Kinnane, R O’Hegarty & P Crowe
Horizontal building extensions: potential in Finnish blocks of flats
J Tarpio & P Lehtovuori
Post-disaster reconstruction and ethics: the power of social capital
B Ubesingha, G Ofori, G Agyekum-Mensah & D Frings
Towards net zero: sectoral ambitions and global trends in building decarbonisation
C E Caballero-Güereca, J Vogel, N Alaux, C M Ouellet-Plamondon, J Silva Santana, G Foliente, T Lützkendorf & A Passer
Climate literacy and labour agency in vocational education and training
J Calvert, V Price, C Winch, L Clarke, M Sahin-Dikmen, P-L Bilodeau & E Dionne
Towards a new neighbourhood-scale climate risk-adaptation approach
C Rigoni, S Oliveira, O Romice, A Moreno-Rangel & A Chatzimichali
Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks
C Foulds, S Royston, A Aggeli, A Crowther & R Robison
Environmental impacts of reclaimed bricks: comparing different deconstruction methods
E Salmio & S Huuhka
eCOMBINE: framework for energy, comfort, behaviour and a multi-domain environment
V M Barthelmes, C Karmann, V Gonzalez Serrano, K Lyu, J Wienold, M Andersen, D Licina & D Khovalyg
Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N Antaki, D Petrescu & V Marin
Post-disaster reconstruction: infill housing prototypes for Kathmandu
J Bolchover & K Mundle
Urban verticalisation: typologies of high-rise development in Santiago
D Moreno-Alba, C Marmolejo-Duarte, M Vicuña del Río & C Aguirre-Núñez
A public theatre as a living lab to create resilience
A Apostu & M Drăghici
Reconstruction in post-war Rome: transnational flows and national identity
J Jiang
Reframing disaster recovery through spatial justice: an integrated framework
M A Gasseloğlu & J E Gonçalves
Tracking energy signatures of British homes from 2020 to 2025
C Hanmer, J Few, F Hollick, S Elam & T Oreszczyn
Spatial (in)justice shaping the home as a space of work
D Milián Bernal, J Laitinen, H Shevchenko, O Ivanova, S Pelsmakers & E Nisonen
Working at home: tactics to reappropriate the home
D Milián Bernal, S Pelsmakers, E Nisonen & J Vanhatalo
Living labs and building testing labs: enabling climate change adaptation
J Hugo & M Farhadian
Energy sufficiency, space temperature and public policy
J Morley
Living labs: a systematic review of success parameters and outcomes
J M Müller
Towards a universal framework for heat pump monitoring at scale
J Crawley, L Domoney, A O’Donovan, J Wingfield, C Dinu, O Kinnane, P O’Sullivan

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
Reimagining Climate Action, Community Engagement and Professional Responsibility
Climate change poses a plethora of challenges for decision- and policy-making on multiple scales. Adopting a risk perspective can identify multiple kinds of risk that must be addressed if climate action is to be successful. John Robinson and Emily Smit (University of Toronto), Pamela Robinson (Toronto Metropolitan University) and Anne Gloger (Catalysts’ Circle) consider the decision-making risks having to do with whether climate mitigation and adaptation policies and programs are likely to achieve their goals.
COP30 Report
Matti Kuittinen (Aalto University) reflects on his experience of attending the 2025 UN Conference of the Parties in Belém, Brazil. The roadmaps and commitments failed to deliver the objectives of the 2025 Paris Agreement. However, 2 countries - Japan and Senegal - announced they are creating roadmaps to decarbonise their buildings. An international group of government ministers put housing on the agenda - specifying the need for reduced carbon and energy use along with affordability, quality and climate resilience.