
www.buildingsandcities.org/journal-content/special-issues/health-inequalities-indoor-environments.html
How do indoor environments affect health inequalities, inequities and injustice?
Health inequalities are a crucial aspect of public health and a pressing societal challenge. Access to healthy indoor spaces that are optimised to promote health should be seen as a fundamental right for all. This special issue is a starting point for the built-environment and public health communities to identify many existing inequities in order to improve methodological approaches, share vocabularies between disciplines, and create new knowledge necessary to create a safe and healthy indoor environments for all. Equitable design could translate into prioritising air quality improvements in the homes of people suffering from respiratory conditions, introducing inclusive design elements for disabled people, or providing energy retrofit subsidies to low-income, fuel-poor households.
Guest editors: Anna Mavrogianni & Marcella Ucci
There is compelling evidence that aspects of indoor environments, e.g. thermal, visual, acoustic conditions and air quality, can adversely affect health, but the role of indoor environments in health inequalities is less understood.
One fundamental question for public health and built-environment research is understanding how and to what extent indoor environments act as effect modifiers of structural inequalities or of other intermediary factors (e.g. outdoor conditions). This would then help address the other fundamental question: which pathways or levers pertaining indoor environments may be most effective at removing inequalities and delivering health equity?
The terms 'health inequality', 'health equity' and 'social determinants of health' deserve explanation. Health inequality refers to mapping and understanding health disparities and their root causes. This can refer to differences in health status (e.g. life expectancy) but also in access to or quality of healthcare services, as well as differences in risky health behaviours (e.g. smoking) and, more broadly, differences in the wider 'social determinants of health'. The latter are deeply intertwined with the notion of health inequalities, framing health as a social phenomenon and emphasising how an individual's (or a group's) position in society plays a central role in health inequities. The most important structural stratifiers and their proxy indicators include: income, education, occupation, social class, gender and race/ethnicity (WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health). Several 'intermediary determinants' shape health outcomes-these include 'material circumstances', such as indoor (and outdoor) environmental conditions where people live and work. The term 'equity' refers to the principles that should guide the identification of potential 'fair' solutions.
The papers published in this special issue illustrate what can be achieved by integrating different methods (e.g. building stock modelling and focus groups) and data sources (e.g. Energy Performance Certificates and mental health data). Beyond their specific findings, the papers are a significant and novel contribution to the literature by providing a blueprint for the successful synthesis of methods and materials originally produced by different disciplines and sectors, and discussing the challenges and opportunities of their respective study designs and approaches.
Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M. Ucci & A.
Mavrogianni
Assessing retrofit policies for fuel-poor homes in London
M. C. Georgiadou, D.
Greenwood, R. Schiano-Phan & F. Russo
IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C. Smith, A.
Drinkwater, M. Modlich, D. van der Horst & R. Doherty
Linking housing, sociodemographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P. Symonds, C. H.
Simpson, G. Petrou, L. Ferguson, A. Mavrogianni & M. Davies
Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K. Govertsen &
M. Kane
A population-level framework to estimate unequal indoor heat and air-pollution exposure
R. Cole, C. Simpson,
L. Ferguson, P. Symonds, J. Taylor, C. Heaviside, P. Murage, H. Macintyre, S.
Hajat, A. Mavrogianni & M. Davies
Reorganising specification practice for component reuse: an exploratory study
S Gao, K Jones, J Xu & J Glass
Kitchen retrofits to support food practices and wellbeing
F J Andrews, A Sal Moslehian, E Warner & R Tucker
From strategy to delivery: a comparative analysis of MMC roadmaps
G Goldman, D Sorokine, F Suerich-Gulick, C Carbone & M Jemtrud
Thermal comfort, ventilation and mosquito-borne disease risk in Zanzibar hospitals
O Sloan Wood, J B Knudsen, K L Schiøler, E Lupenza, M Msellem & F Saleh
Reusing precast concrete elements in construction: assessing the economic conditions
O Vigren, H Westerlind & T Malmqvist
Institutional readiness for industrialised social housing in Vietnam
T Q Nguyen, B N Nguyen, T H Q To & Z Aziz
Prefabrication for housing retrofit: governance, innovation and resident experience
E Pikas, K Kuusk, P Pihelo, R Liias, J Pukk & T Kalamees
Reframing heat pump transitions: a care perspective
J van der Haer, R Schelwald & F de Haan
Urban informal settlements in Africa: transforming adaptation governance
K Buyana & H Sseviiri
Reusing concrete products in indoor environments: chemical hazard assessment
K Tähtinen, A Helin, E Parshintsev & H Hovi
Negotiating net-zero carbon: an ANT analysis of two buildings
L Schweber & M Green
Design for disassembly: a review of public policy proposals
O Vorobjev, U Uotila, T Joensuu & A Saari
Retrofitting Norwegian residential buildings: an archetype-based dynamic stock model
L S A Rousseau, S Amini, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Decolonising time: vernacular villages and the politics of heritage temporality
R Al-Rabady
Commutes to alternative workplaces: GHG emissions and physical activity
J Taylor, L Thoen, A Espinosa Mireles De Villafranca, P Anashin, J Vanhatalo, D Milián
Bernal & I Okkonen
Nine ‘myths’ about the building stock of Great Britain
S Evans, P Steadman, A Neto-Bradley, D Humphrey, R Liddiard,H Shamsi, J Palmer & G Simons
Critical Reconstruction Theory and the invention of post-disaster response
G Lizarralde, D Wachsmuth, F Özdoğan & M Cossu
Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui’s dual disaster recovery
A Y F Urushima & K Yamaguchi

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
Anticipating Chronic Climate Risks
How can local authorities better anticipate and reduce chronic climate risks in the built environment? With 20 years' experience working in local authorities tackling climate change, Joe Baker considers the challenges facing local authorities to identify and manage climate risks, and asks: How do we get the leadership, skills, capacity and meaningful action needed?
Remote Sensing for Urban Development Policies
At the 2026 Sustainable Buildings and Construction Summit Magnus Andersson, David Muthui & Reza Roodaki (Malmö University) argued that remote sensing should be a core evidence infrastructure for sustainable urban governance. Satellite derived and geospatial analysis can observe and monitor urban expansion, densification, land consumption, building form and material demand across jurisdictions and over time. A shift from two-dimensional to three-dimensional sensing and analysis provides new data to inform policies for housing, land-use efficiency, disaster exposure, public space, resource efficiency and resilient construction.