
www.buildingsandcities.org/journal-content/special-issues/health-inequalities-indoor-environments.html
How do indoor environments affect health inequalities, inequities and injustice?
Health inequalities are a crucial aspect of public health and a pressing societal challenge. Access to healthy indoor spaces that are optimised to promote health should be seen as a fundamental right for all. This special issue is a starting point for the built-environment and public health communities to identify many existing inequities in order to improve methodological approaches, share vocabularies between disciplines, and create new knowledge necessary to create a safe and healthy indoor environments for all. Equitable design could translate into prioritising air quality improvements in the homes of people suffering from respiratory conditions, introducing inclusive design elements for disabled people, or providing energy retrofit subsidies to low-income, fuel-poor households.
Guest editors: Anna Mavrogianni & Marcella Ucci
There is compelling evidence that aspects of indoor environments, e.g. thermal, visual, acoustic conditions and air quality, can adversely affect health, but the role of indoor environments in health inequalities is less understood.
One fundamental question for public health and built-environment research is understanding how and to what extent indoor environments act as effect modifiers of structural inequalities or of other intermediary factors (e.g. outdoor conditions). This would then help address the other fundamental question: which pathways or levers pertaining indoor environments may be most effective at removing inequalities and delivering health equity?
The terms 'health inequality', 'health equity' and 'social determinants of health' deserve explanation. Health inequality refers to mapping and understanding health disparities and their root causes. This can refer to differences in health status (e.g. life expectancy) but also in access to or quality of healthcare services, as well as differences in risky health behaviours (e.g. smoking) and, more broadly, differences in the wider 'social determinants of health'. The latter are deeply intertwined with the notion of health inequalities, framing health as a social phenomenon and emphasising how an individual's (or a group's) position in society plays a central role in health inequities. The most important structural stratifiers and their proxy indicators include: income, education, occupation, social class, gender and race/ethnicity (WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health). Several 'intermediary determinants' shape health outcomes-these include 'material circumstances', such as indoor (and outdoor) environmental conditions where people live and work. The term 'equity' refers to the principles that should guide the identification of potential 'fair' solutions.
The papers published in this special issue illustrate what can be achieved by integrating different methods (e.g. building stock modelling and focus groups) and data sources (e.g. Energy Performance Certificates and mental health data). Beyond their specific findings, the papers are a significant and novel contribution to the literature by providing a blueprint for the successful synthesis of methods and materials originally produced by different disciplines and sectors, and discussing the challenges and opportunities of their respective study designs and approaches.
Health inequalities and indoor environments: research challenges and priorities [editorial]
M. Ucci & A.
Mavrogianni
Assessing retrofit policies for fuel-poor homes in London
M. C. Georgiadou, D.
Greenwood, R. Schiano-Phan & F. Russo
IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people
C. Smith, A.
Drinkwater, M. Modlich, D. van der Horst & R. Doherty
Linking housing, sociodemographic, environmental and mental health data at scale
P. Symonds, C. H.
Simpson, G. Petrou, L. Ferguson, A. Mavrogianni & M. Davies
Measuring health inequities due to housing characteristics
K. Govertsen &
M. Kane
A population-level framework to estimate unequal indoor heat and air-pollution exposure
R. Cole, C. Simpson,
L. Ferguson, P. Symonds, J. Taylor, C. Heaviside, P. Murage, H. Macintyre, S.
Hajat, A. Mavrogianni & M. Davies
Retrofitting Norwegian residential buildings: an archetype-based dynamic stock model
L S A Rousseau, S Amini, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Decolonising time: vernacular villages and the politics of heritage temporality
R Al-Rabady
Commutes to alternative workplaces: GHG emissions and physical activity
J Taylor, L Thoen, A Espinosa Mireles De Villafranca, P Anashin, J Vanhatalo, D Milián
Bernal & I Okkonen
Nine ‘myths’ about the building stock of Great Britain
S Evans, P Steadman, A Neto-Bradley, D Humphrey, R Liddiard,H Shamsi, J Palmer & G Simons
Critical Reconstruction Theory and the invention of post-disaster response
G Lizarralde, D Wachsmuth, F Özdoğan & M Cossu
Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui’s dual disaster recovery
A Y F Urushima & K Yamaguchi
Critical reflections on the process of interdisciplinary building science research
G T Morgan, M F Touchie, J Robinson, A Jakubiec & J Tran
Comparing technical disassembly potential methods for concrete and timber buildings
N Westerholm, A Tuure, S Pajunen & M Kuittinen
One-stop shops as leverage points for renovation sufficiency
G Pardalis & M Sula
Creating resilient cities: advocacy and planning for equity-based recovery
A Paidakaki
Impact of glazed balcony design on daylight in Finnish apartments
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa & S Pelsmakers
Climate-related risks: implications for municipal governments in Brazil
C Nastari Fernandes, P Ciminelli Ramalho & F Lima-Silva
Changing land-use metrics in mass housing: Türkiye case study
M S Çepni, A K Kutluca, T Salihoğlu, A Atmaca & S Mintemur
Personal comfort systems for adults with intellectual disabilities
K Exss, M Trebilcock, P Wegertseder-Martínez, S Schiavon & H Zhang
How buildings shape occupant movement: a systematic review and framework
G Chinazzo & N Wang
Rethinking the second life of post-disaster and post-conflict temporary housing
N Akdede, B Ö Ay & İ Gürsel Dino
Embodied carbon impacts of residential development siteworks: new assessment framework
P Comerford, O Kinnane, R O’Hegarty & P Crowe
Horizontal building extensions: potential in Finnish blocks of flats
J Tarpio & P Lehtovuori
Post-disaster reconstruction and ethics: the power of social capital
B Ubesingha, G Ofori, G Agyekum-Mensah & D Frings
Towards net zero: sectoral ambitions and global trends in building decarbonisation
C E Caballero-Güereca, J Vogel, N Alaux, C M Ouellet-Plamondon, J Silva Santana, G Foliente, T Lützkendorf & A Passer
Climate literacy and labour agency in vocational education and training
J Calvert, V Price, C Winch, L Clarke, M Sahin-Dikmen, P-L Bilodeau & E Dionne
Towards a new neighbourhood-scale climate risk-adaptation approach
C Rigoni, S Oliveira, O Romice, A Moreno-Rangel & A Chatzimichali
Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks
C Foulds, S Royston, A Aggeli, A Crowther & R Robison
Environmental impacts of reclaimed bricks: comparing different deconstruction methods
E Salmio & S Huuhka
eCOMBINE: framework for energy, comfort, behaviour and a multi-domain environment
V M Barthelmes, C Karmann, V Gonzalez Serrano, K Lyu, J Wienold, M Andersen, D Licina & D Khovalyg
Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N Antaki, D Petrescu & V Marin

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
Remote Sensing for Urban Development Policies
At the 2026 Sustainable Buildings and Construction Summit Magnus Andersson, David Muthui & Reza Roodaki (Malmö University) argued that remote sensing should be a core evidence infrastructure for sustainable urban governance. Satellite derived and geospatial analysis can observe and monitor urban expansion, densification, land consumption, building form and material demand across jurisdictions and over time. A shift from two-dimensional to three-dimensional sensing and analysis provides new data to inform policies for housing, land-use efficiency, disaster exposure, public space, resource efficiency and resilient construction.
Disaster Reconstruction: Practitioner Insights Improve Outcomes
Regan Potangaroa (Auckland University of Technology - AUT), Kelvin Zuo (Massey University), Suzanne Wilkinson (AUT) explain why experience-led knowledge from the field, when triangulated with contemporaneous documentation, can constitute evidence for understanding post-disaster reconstruction systems. People working within reconstruction environments (engineers, builders, logisticians and community actors) provide crucial observations about how reconstruction systems function in practice, particularly supply chains, material flows, procurement and governance in post-disaster rebuilding. Integrating this knowledge can lead to better outcomes.