By Sandy Halliday. Routledge, 2019, ISBN: 9781138200289
Building scientist, troubleshooter and policy advisor Bill Bordass reviews the second edition of this book. It is substantially rewritten and even better than the first edition, which was itself derived from a series of teaching modules.
This is a very good book, intelligent in
outlook, broad in scope, well-structured, well-illustrated and inspirational.
Perhaps uniquely, it is also highly readable and will appeal to a wide
audience: from experts and professionals to students and non-specialists -
perhaps someone wondering what to do to improve the sustainability of their
house or workplace, or a policymaker seeking to be better-informed on a subject
that is at last appearing in mainstream debate. This is a remarkable
achievement. Although there are many other books on sustainable built
environment, this one provides a consistent, wide-ranging and insightful
approach.
This new edition has more pages, fewer
sections and more illustrations. 120 short case studies (of buildings,
procedures, studies, results etc.) from around the world are interspersed with
the text, enlivening the presentation and triggering the imagination. I only
wish the publishers had changed the title: it is about so much more than
construction and should be found at the front of the bookshop, not to special
order, or in a remote technical backwater.
Of its twelve Sections, the first four are on background issues: Drivers (a history of ideas on the subject over the past half-century, illustrated by iconic early projects), Policy and Legislation (including some local policies that can be thought-provoking, e.g. why isn’t everybody doing this?), Cost Issues (not a dreary succession of tables but a thoughtful discussion of cost, investment, value in the broadest sense, and doing more with less), and Appraisal Methods. The next six cover technical aspects: Materials Selection, Low-impact Construction, Internal Environmental Control (with fabric coming first of course), Energy Generation, Lighting and Daylighting, and Water and Sewage Management. Then comes Construction Processes (which stresses the importance of briefing, consultation, questioning assumptions, and continuity in maintaining initial aspirations), and a concluding section on Urban Ecology, reaching outside buildings themselves.
The book has the great advantage of being
written by a single person with great knowledge, long experience, clear
insights and a sense of purpose: not inconsistently cobbled together from
different chapter authors, as too often happens with books of such a wide scope.
It is not just a technical manual: the author hopes it will help move
sustainable construction to the heart and soul of economic and social policy
and contribute to health, well-being and life chances.
As an assessor of building performance in
use, this reviewer would like to have seen a few longer case studies – but perhaps
these are better left to others on the web, as the information can date quite
rapidly. Some case studies could also have been more critical, particularly for
projects for which good in-use performance histories are available. Getting any
building to work in accordance with its design intent is difficult: most never
do, owing to the lack of a chain of custody that connects from client and
design intent to operational reality. The need for this “golden thread” was also
pointed out in the recent report (Hackitt,
2019) into the horrific fire at Grenfell Tower in London – where ill-considered
alterations to improve thermal performance appear to have been a major
contributor. As at Grenfell, many building projects lack sufficient attention
to detail; and seldom receive much aftercare and fine tuning in the months or
even years after handover. The results also include the now-notorious
“performance gaps” between energy performance claims and actual outcomes. Other
aspects can also fall short, including occupant satisfaction, health and
comfort.
An example of one kind of discrepancy is
what happened with Oberlin College’s Adam Joseph Lewis Centre (completed
in 2001). Its spacesused about three times the predicted amount of energy, far exceeding
the annual supply from the 60 kWp rooftop photovoltaic panels that were
intended to make it a nett energy exporter. This dramatically increased its primary
energy and carbon footprint, as the low-energy expectations had meant it was all-electric.
Five years later, with 101 kWp of photovoltaic panels added over the car park,
its annual electricity use still exceeded the PV supply. This situation was only
remedied in 2012 – eleven years after completion – when the College appointed a
building manager who initially worked full-time on solving the building’s performance
problems (Janda
& Topouzi, 2015). During the whole time, its performance was
scrutinised by Oberlin’s academics – who initially disagreed radically about
assessment methods, which greatly affected any conclusions about its sustainability.
This all provided a valuable learning experience.
Insights such as this would have added further
depth to the arguments in the book. Buildings with sustainable design intent
and a skilled team can be intrinsically more robust than ordinary ones: more
future-proof and less dependent on consumables, technology, management and
maintenance. However, the job of creating a well-integrated and well-performing
building is exacting, as there tend to be more interdependencies between people,
skills, elements, systems, technologies and management; and routine tune-ups
after completion seldom happen. I liken it to a staircase: if not all the steps
are in place, you won’t end up where you want to be.
Modern procurement systems often don’t help
either, salami-slicing the “golden thread” from client and design intent to
practical reality: the author likens this to a relay race in which the baton is
not passed over. We need radical change in client, industry and government practices;
true professionals across design and building teams who take full account of
“the other” in their work and follow their projects through after handover; and
an industry that pays attention to detail and is driven by achieving good
performance in reality, not just in theory.
A good read end-to-end, this book has a clear structure and a good index, and can be dipped into at any point. Recently, I was pleased to see an already well-thumbed copy in the studio of one of those few architecture schools that make sustainability central to their curriculum. Other departments – not just architectural - now have no excuse not to follow suit: this important book should become a standard text for all built environment students and practitioners. If it also receives the broader attention it deserves, it will have achieved the author’s ambition to put a thoughtful approach to sustainable buildings and environments into mainstream economic and social thinking. For anybody not yet convinced, an informative four-minute introductory video by the author is here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMJtLb4nDUU .
Hackitt, J. (May 2019) Building a safer future, Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: Final Report, London: HMSO, chapter 8. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-building-regulations-and-fire-safety-final-report
Janda, K. & Topouzi, M. (2015) Telling tales: using stories to remake energy policy, Building Research & Information, 43:4, 516-533, page 521 et seq. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09613218.2015.1020217
Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets
L Hvid Horup, P K Ohms, M Hauschild, S R B Gummidi, A Q Secher, C Thuesen, M Ryberg
Equity and justice in urban coastal adaptation planning: new evaluation framework
T Okamoto & A Doyon
Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey
Suburban climate adaptation governance: assumptions and imaginaries affecting peripheral municipalities
L Cerrada Morato
Urban shrinkage as a catalyst for transformative adaptation
L Mabon, M Sato & N Mabon
Maintaining a city against nature: climate adaptation in Beira
J Schubert
Ventilation regulations and occupant practices: undetectable pollution and invisible extraction
J Few, M Shipworth & C Elwell
Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar
How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang
Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow
Gender and the heat pump transition
J Crawley, F Wade & M de Wilde
Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson
Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka
Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves
European building passports: developments, challenges and future roles
M Buchholz & T Lützkendorf
Decision-support for selecting demolition waste management strategies
M van den Berg, L Hulsbeek & H Voordijk
Assessing social value in housing design: contributions of the capability approach
J-C Dissart & L Ricaurte
Electricity consumption in commercial buildings during Covid-19
G P Duggan, P Bauleo, M Authier, P A Aloise-Young, J Care & D Zimmerle
Disruptive data: historicising the platformisation of Dublin’s taxi industry
J White & S Larsson
Impact of 2050 tree shading strategies on building cooling demands
A Czekajlo, J Alva, J Szeto, C Girling & R Kellett
Social values and social infrastructures: a multi-perspective approach to place
A Legeby & C Pech
Resilience of racialized segregation is an ecological factor: Baltimore case study
S T A Pickett, J M Grove, C G Boone & G L Buckley
Latest Commentaries
Time to Question Demolition!
André Thomsen (Delft University of Technology) comments on the recent Buildings & Cities special issue ‘Understanding Demolition’ and explains why this phenomenon is only beginning to be understood more fully as a social and behavioural set of issues. Do we need an epidemiology of different demolition rates?
Where are Women of Colour in Urban Planning?
Safaa Charafi asks: is it possible to decolonialise the planning profession to create more inclusive and egalitarian urban settings? It is widely accepted that cities are built by men for other men. This male domination in urban planning results in cities that often do not adequately address challenges encountered by women or ethnic and social minorities. Although efforts are being taken to include women in urban planning, women of colour are still under-represented in many countries, resulting in cities that often overlook their needs.