Edited by N.B. Rajkovich and S.H. Holmes. Routledge, 2022. ISBN 9780367467333
Climate change presents not only an existential threat to humanity as outlined in the latest reports by the International Panel on Climate Change (2021), but also a new reality for professionals to integrate into all projects. Efforts to mitigate climate change and reduce the impacts are essential, but the process is not moving fast enough to avoid significant impacts. Accepting the consequences of a changing climate and designing for adaptation is not surrender, but an urgent reality to design for adaptation. This timely book provides a range of perspectives on the critical design issues for climate change.
In the Foreword, Ann Kosmal outlines the collection of interdisciplinary approaches gathered in the book. It should be a call to action for not just design teams, but leaders of all types: community, policy makers, developers and beyond. Readers of the book will find themselves responding not only in their professional roles, but also as citizens of their community and as individuals. A key concern is: what knowledge and insights can help build your capacity to respond to the challenge? Building capacity can occur at a range of scales from individual mindset to facilitation of stakeholder processes to researching climate modeling. The answers are delivered in a range of forms from new methods, strategies, project case studies, tools and expanded perspectives. While many of the answers may not be the ultimate solutions, they begin to lay out the ingredients of an effective design method for adapting to climate change. As Holmes and Rajkovich outline in the Introduction:
this book is not a prescriptive approach of one discipline, the chapters that follow consider climate adaptation and resilience through the lenses of architecture, landscape architecture, planning and engineering.
A core question of designing for a climate adaptation and resilience at all scales is: “what is the new climate that a design should consider?” The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021) has released its Sixth Assessment Report. This models potential scenarios for the effects of climate change at the global and regional scale. Temperature, precipitation, biodiversity, agriculture and other factors are considered. However, design practitioners and researchers must understand and translate this information to the scale of the built environment: buildings, neighborhoods, cities, watersheds etc. In addition, the global data need to be downscaled and expanded to consider not only temperature and rainfall, but also wind speed, humidity and other factors that inform the design of built environment. The book does not consider the most current climate predictions but starts a conversation on the research methodology to apply to any set of climate prediction data to translate it to building design. Chapter 2 by Seth Holmes provides an excellent survey of building simulations that have used climate change simulations. In addition, the chapter reviews design measures that could mitigate the impacts of the changing climate and a process for evaluating results. It establishes a knowledge foundation for anyone interested in exploring the dynamic and critically needed research in translating planetary scale climate models into useful tools for design simulation. The other chapters in the simulation sector of the book seek to explore the use of alternative methods and tools to bridge the complex world of climate simulation into longer term building design, community engagement and even individuals with the decision-making tools for a broad audience.
Kristin Baja’s chapter on the concept of Resilience Hubs is a powerful exploration of the concept and process that communities can use to building their resilience capacity. The intention is to not just create a building that is used temporarily, but a center that helps a community thrive. Resilience hubs do this by fostering connectivity and focusing on the development of five foundation areas: services and programming, buildings and landscape, power systems, communications and operations. The concept has the potential to not only meet community needs at a variety of scales, but also be a catalytic tool for community resilience.
The chapters on climate change and health (Connecting the Dots, Building a Resilient Future and Increasing Adaptive Capacity of Vulnerable Populations) propose a shift in the design process to ‘co-create’ a vision for a resilient future with all members of the community. The most disadvantaged members of society are often the most adversely affected by climate change. Climate justice involves four interconnected dimensions (Klinsky and Mavrogianni, 2020): there are disparities in the causal responsibility, impacts, vulnerability and social, temporal and spatial distance from climate change. Policy makers, strategists and designers should not only be aware of the inequitable effects of climate change and the missing perspectives, but also the need for an inclusive resilient design process. The book calls for a longer view of community infrastructure that considers them outlasting climate impacts. It may be impossible for buildings to ‘outlast’ climate impacts, but the goal of shifting the focus from responding to immediate challenges to a longer and potentially multi-scaled approach to time should benefit the resilient design process. Maisel, Perez and Macy’s chapter on engaging stakeholders in climate resilience to increase a community’s adaptive capacity is a powerful call for equity in the resilient design process. An inclusive process could benefit resilient design on many levels from integrating community capacity building to understanding local knowledge and perspectives to increasing empathy, connection and communication. This chapter presents one of the more powerful calls to action for designers and communities to get to work on building community resilience and share their stories. However, the chapters do not go far enough in reconsidering the role of the designer/planner in an inclusive planning process. At a minimum, further discussion of the planner as bricoleur: orchestrating the co-creation process with stakeholders and building their capacity to develop transformative solutions should be explored in the future of the work.
Alex Wilson’s chapter on Passive Survivability re-connects with his thoughtful body of work over 15 years. This began with the New Orleans Principles (US Green Building Council 2005) to outline a method that enables buildings to provide a habitable environment after disruptions (hurricanes, floods, social unrest etc.) of the provision of electricity, water and other essential services. Simple in concept, the chapter explores new methods, metrics and modeling to assess a buildings ability to provide ‘passive survivability’. Wilson advocates additional research is undertaken to define the concept with more specific requirements. In the future, a passive survivability requirement could be integrated into building codes as an important life safety measure.
The book concludes with case studies of resilient design in a variety of contexts and scales with a final chapter with interviews from practitioners. The perspectives are from a variety of sectors, disciplines and regions of North America. This conversation provides a starting point for applying resilient design in practice. It conveys the successes, barriers, frustration and drive to integrate resilient design across many scales to benefit communities in a dynamic future. Such conversations represent an important trajectory forward for putting the theory of resilient design into practice. In the future, this work could be extended to a wider set of community design practitioners to not only include professionals, but also the experience and insights of community members to share their stories of the power of design to build a resilient future.
This book deserves to be widely read internationally. Although its focus is primarily on a North American perspective of resilience, its goal is to kickstart interdisciplinary dialogue, deeper understandings and collective action to anticipate and create a resilient built environment. It urges us to initiate a long-term process of adaptation to climate change. Expanded dialogue will also help to integrate a more international conversation and call for action. This will enable designers, planners, policy makers, developers and community members to create, adapt and maintain a built environment that responds to climate change. Such actions will protect the vulnerable, but also provide well-being for all.
Klinsky, S. & Mavrogianni, A. (2020). Climate justice and the built environment. Buildings and Cities, 1(1), 412–428. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/bc.65
International Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press.
US Green Building Council (2005). The New Orleans Principles: Celebrating the Rich History of New Orleans Through Commitment to a Sustainable Future. New Orleans Planning Charrette after Hurricane Katrina.
Speculation beyond technology: building scenarios through storytelling
R M Dowsett, M S Green & C F Harty
Professional judgement: an institutional logic approach to contractor tender pricing
D Jefferies & L Schweber
Emerging technologies’ impacts on ‘man caves’ and their energy demand
Y Strengers, K Dahlgren & L Nicholls
The gender of smart charging
Who cares? How care practices uphold the decentralised energy order
K Lucas-Healey, H Ransan- Cooper, H Temby & A W Russell
Alternatives to air-conditioning: policies, design, technologies, behaviours [editorial]
B Ford, D Mumovic & R Rawal
Benchmarking energy performance: indicators and models for Dutch housing associations
H S van der Bent, H J Visscher, A Meijer & N Mouter
Emissions from a net-zero building in India: life cycle assessment
M Jain & R Rawal
Lack of adaptability in Brazilian social housing: impacts on residents
S B Villa, P B Vasconcellos, K C R de Bortoli & L B de Araujo
Participation in domestic energy retrofit programmes: key spatio- temporal drivers
E Mohareb, A Gillich & D Bristow
Embodied carbon of concrete in buildings, Part 2: are the messages accurate?
A Moncaster, T Malmqvist, T Forman, F Pomponi & J Anderson
An alternative approach to delivering safe, sustainable surgical theatre environments
C A Short, A W Woods, L Drumright, R Zia & N Mingotti
Integrating low energy cooling & ventilation strategies in Indian residences
M J Cook, Y Shukla, R Rawal, C Angelopoulos, L Caruggi-De-Faria, D Loveday, E Spentzou, & J Patel
Balconies as adaptable spaces in apartment housing
T Peters & S Masoudinejad
Residential geothermal air-conditioning: inhabitants’ comfort, behaviour and energy use
L Thomas, A Woods, R Powles, P Kalali, & S Wilkinson
Energy retrofit and passive cooling: overheating and air quality in primary schools
D Grassie, Y Schwartz, P Symonds, I Korolija, A Mavrogianni & D Mumovic
Outdoor PM2.5 air filtration: optimising indoor air quality and energy
E Belias & D Licina
Architects’ ‘enforced togetherness’: new design affordances of the home
E Marco, M Tahsiri, D Sinnett & S Oliveira
Overheating assessment in Passivhaus dwellings: the influence of prediction tools
V L Goncalves, V Costanzo, K Fabbri & T Rakha
The use of apartment balconies: context, design & social norms
M Smektała & M Baborska-Narożny
Sharing a home under lockdown in London
F Blanc & K Scanlon
Projected climate data for building design: barriers to use
P Rastogi, A Laxo, L Cecil &D Overbey
Residents’ views on adaptable housing: a virtual reality-based study
J Tarpio & S Huuhka
Many cities throughout the world have set carbon and / or energy targets including renewable energy production and emissions reduction goals. Despite the commitment to take action, cities do not directly control the majority of the uses of energy or consumption-related sources of carbon emissions within their boundaries. Could a focus on household energy use, personal travel and consumption of material goods help to achieve this transition at city level? Tina Fawcett (University of Oxford), Kerry Constabile (University of Oxford) and Yael Parag (Reichman University) consider whether and how cities could harness personal carbon allowances in a practical manner.
The former Swiss 'Impulse programme' was a successful response to the 1970s energy crisis. It provides important lessons for today’s climate emergency about what governments, industry and academia can do to create a successful transition within the construction industry. Niklaus Kohler and Kurt Meier (both former members of the Construction and Energy Impulse programmes) reflect on key lessons for today about its implementation and how to sustain change over the short and long term.