
www.buildingsandcities.org/insights/news/levels-sustainable-buildings.html
The 'Level(s)' provides professionals with a framework guiding the sustainability performance assessment of buildings.
Building sector policies and legislation at EU level are being updated to help improve sustainability performance throughout the building life cycle - from design to end-of-life. This reorientation to a more circular built environment will be essential in delivering on commitments under the European Green Deal to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050 and to decouple economic growth from resource use.
The 'Level(s)' provides professionals with a framework guiding the sustainability performance assessment of buildings. Josefina Lindblom (Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission) explains how construction professionals, property developers, investors, business leaders and policymakers at national, regional and local level can prepare for EU legislation and embrace these changes.
Level(s) is a sustainability performance assessment solution. It has six objectives, addressing the main sustainability considerations throughout the building life cycle, from planning and design through to deconstruction and demolition. It can be used by all kinds of buildings professionals, including construction managers, property developers, investors, planners, procurers, product manufacturers, architects, waste management professionals and many others.
The sustainability indicators within each Level(s) objective describe how a building's performance can be aligned with EU policy in areas such as energy, material use, water, waste, and resilience to climate change.
While Level(s) has been freely available since October 2020, the European Commission (EC) recently published a new eLearning programme to make Level(s) easily accessible to professionals across the sector.
The use of Level(s) helps an individual or organisation stay ahead of (and be compliant with) revisions to legislation. For example, the EC has proposed a revision to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. It calls for buildings professionals to calculate the life cycle Global Warming Potential (GWP) for most new builds from 2030, using the Level(s) methodology. For large buildings (with a useful floor area of more than 2 000 m2) the obligation to calculate GWP would apply in 2027.
Level(s) also informed the recent Commission Proposal for the Construction Product Regulation, which sets harmonised rules for CE marking construction products in the EU. This proposal covers the macro objectives of Level(s) in the 'basic requirements for construction works' in Annex I of the Regulation. Characteristics addressed in Level(s) will be part of the declaration of performance for CE marked products.
Level(s) is referenced in the proposed revision of the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) too, adopted by the Commission in July 2021. For the first time, the EED encourages Member States to include the life cycle perspective when procuring public buildings. Furthermore, Level(s) will be the basis for the revision of the Green Public Procurement Criteria for office buildings. These criteria will be expanded to cover schools and social housing, and will pay particular attention to renovation. The intention is to make them even more firmly based on circularity and life cycle principles. Level(s) is therefore helping to guide changes to several pieces of legislation and creating a strong incentive for the building sector to adopt the framework.
The eLearning programme has been developed for professionals involved in each or all the different stages of the building lifecycle. The course materials also highlight the roles and responsibilities for each type of building professional when using Level(s). This means the eLearning programme is suitable for use by experts throughout the built environment. The programme covers all the Level(s) sustainability performance assessment indicators.
In addition, a new Calculation and Assessment Tool (CAT) makes it easier to measure sustainability performance. CAT supports complete life cycle assessments using Level(s) during the different life cycle stages. It is a user-friendly solution for completing Level(s) assessments on your building projects and provides a simpler way to calculate and compare results between different projects. Its interface is designed with SMEs and micro-enterprises in mind and there are no fees or charges for using CAT. The most common uses of CAT are:
Retrofitting Norwegian residential buildings: an archetype-based dynamic stock model
L S A Rousseau, S Amini, S Akin & E G Hertwich
Decolonising time: vernacular villages and the politics of heritage temporality
R Al-Rabady
Commutes to alternative workplaces: GHG emissions and physical activity
J Taylor, L Thoen, A Espinosa Mireles De Villafranca, P Anashin, J Vanhatalo, D Milián
Bernal & I Okkonen
Nine ‘myths’ about the building stock of Great Britain
S Evans, P Steadman, A Neto-Bradley, D Humphrey, R Liddiard,H Shamsi, J Palmer & G Simons
Critical Reconstruction Theory and the invention of post-disaster response
G Lizarralde, D Wachsmuth, F Özdoğan & M Cossu
Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui’s dual disaster recovery
A Y F Urushima & K Yamaguchi
Critical reflections on the process of interdisciplinary building science research
G T Morgan, M F Touchie, J Robinson, A Jakubiec & J Tran
Comparing technical disassembly potential methods for concrete and timber buildings
N Westerholm, A Tuure, S Pajunen & M Kuittinen
One-stop shops as leverage points for renovation sufficiency
G Pardalis & M Sula
Creating resilient cities: advocacy and planning for equity-based recovery
A Paidakaki
Impact of glazed balcony design on daylight in Finnish apartments
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa & S Pelsmakers
Climate-related risks: implications for municipal governments in Brazil
C Nastari Fernandes, P Ciminelli Ramalho & F Lima-Silva
Changing land-use metrics in mass housing: Türkiye case study
M S Çepni, A K Kutluca, T Salihoğlu, A Atmaca & S Mintemur
Personal comfort systems for adults with intellectual disabilities
K Exss, M Trebilcock, P Wegertseder-Martínez, S Schiavon & H Zhang
How buildings shape occupant movement: a systematic review and framework
G Chinazzo & N Wang
Rethinking the second life of post-disaster and post-conflict temporary housing
N Akdede, B Ö Ay & İ Gürsel Dino
Embodied carbon impacts of residential development siteworks: new assessment framework
P Comerford, O Kinnane, R O’Hegarty & P Crowe
Horizontal building extensions: potential in Finnish blocks of flats
J Tarpio & P Lehtovuori
Post-disaster reconstruction and ethics: the power of social capital
B Ubesingha, G Ofori, G Agyekum-Mensah & D Frings
Towards net zero: sectoral ambitions and global trends in building decarbonisation
C E Caballero-Güereca, J Vogel, N Alaux, C M Ouellet-Plamondon, J Silva Santana, G Foliente, T Lützkendorf & A Passer
Climate literacy and labour agency in vocational education and training
J Calvert, V Price, C Winch, L Clarke, M Sahin-Dikmen, P-L Bilodeau & E Dionne
Towards a new neighbourhood-scale climate risk-adaptation approach
C Rigoni, S Oliveira, O Romice, A Moreno-Rangel & A Chatzimichali
Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks
C Foulds, S Royston, A Aggeli, A Crowther & R Robison
Environmental impacts of reclaimed bricks: comparing different deconstruction methods
E Salmio & S Huuhka
eCOMBINE: framework for energy, comfort, behaviour and a multi-domain environment
V M Barthelmes, C Karmann, V Gonzalez Serrano, K Lyu, J Wienold, M Andersen, D Licina & D Khovalyg
Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N Antaki, D Petrescu & V Marin

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
Preparedness for Recovery
Kristen MacAskill (University of Cambridge) and Lianne Dalziel (University of Canterbury) explain capabilities (and the associated capacity) are essential for preparedness. Capacity for both physical infrastructure and organisational / institutional response are necessary. This commentary focuses primarily on institutional capacity for disaster risk management, and the positive (if slow) developments in the value that is being placed on preparedness.
Chronic Climate Risks to Urban Infrastructure
As the climate is changing, urban areas around the world face multiple risks of both acute and chronic climate hazards. Sarah Greenham & Emma Ferranti (University of Birmingham) consider the impacts on urban infrastructure of these different risks and what kinds of actions are needed to address them.