
www.buildingsandcities.org/journal-content/special-issues/living-labs-agents-for-change.html
What are the roles and impacts that Living Labs play in increasing civic resilience and supporting ecological transition in different contexts and at different scales?
This special issue examines how living labs (LLs) build capacity among stakeholders, reshape spaces, and influence governance to support civic resilience and ecological transition.
An LL is a real-world environment where research, innovative products or services are tested and co-developed with everyday participants in a collaborative setting. In the last decade, the LL methodology has become a key method for conducting research by engaging with ecological transition. LLs offer the possibility of connecting researchers and citizens, engaging them in collective action to identify common needs, develop collaborative methods to respond to these needs and share methods for wider implementation. LLs can be a means of expanding the capacity of citizens to engage in processes of change and increased civic resilience.
Guest editors: Nicola Antaki, Doina Petrescu, Vera Marin
The various roles of LLs are examined for how they empower new and existing actors, mediate between diverse stakeholders, and foster bottom-up agency for change. LLs can provide the social, institutional and material groundwork for future change in the built environment. This special issue underscores LLs’ contribution to governance innovation, particularly engagement that brings together public authorities, industry, academia and civil society. By catalysing policy learning and multi-actor coordination, LLs can influence how transitions are organised and implemented.
LLs can be called ‘agents for change’ because they have the potential to tangibly reshape capacities, relations, spaces and systems, yielding documented transformations. They demonstrate 'change' in stakeholder capacity-building; bottom-up agency; diversification of governance; and spatial activation. Individually and collectively, papers in this special issue show that LLs can be agents of change by offering opportunities for developing civic agency, transforming space and testing/proposing modes of governance adaptation.
The special issue contributes new knowledge in terms of roles and relationships, spatial change and governance: the capacity for change with a focus on actors, roles and methods, key LL typologies; means of evaluation; and processes inside of / generated by LLs.
Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N. Antaki, D. Petrescu & V. Marin
Researchers’ shifting roles in living labs for knowledge co-production
C.-C. Dobre & G. Faldi
The importance of multi-roles and code-switching in living labs
H. Noller & A. Tarik
Mediation roles and ecologies within resilience-focused urban living labs
N. Antaki, D. Petrescu, M. Schalk, E. Brandao, D. Calciu & V.
Marin
Co-curation as civic practice in community engagement
Z. Li, M. Sunikka-Blank, R. Purohit & F. Samuel
Youth engagement in urban living labs: tools, methods and pedagogies
N. Charalambous, C. Panayi, C. Mady, T. Augustinčić & D. Berc
A living lab approach to co-designing climate adaptation strategies
M. K. Barati & S. Bankaru-Swamy
Co-learning in living labs: nurturing civic agency and resilience
A. Belfield
Placemaking living lab: creating resilient social and spatial infrastructure
M. Dodd, N. Madabhushi & R. Lees
Urban rooms and the expanded ecology of urban living labs
E. Akbil & C. Butterworth
Expanding the framework of urban living labs using grassroots methods
T. Ahmed, I. Delsante & L. Migliavacca
Living labs: a systematic review of success parameters and outcomes
J. M. Müller
Circularity at the neighbourhood scale: co-creative living lab lessons
J. Honsa, A. Versele, T. Van de Kerckhove, & C. Piccardo
Urban living labs: relationality between institutions and local circularity
P. Palo, M. Adelfio, J. Lundin & E. Brandão
A public theatre as a living lab to create resilience
A. Apostu & M. Drăghici
Co-creating interventions to prevent mosquito-borne disease transmission in hospitals
O. Sloan Wood, E. Lupenza, D. M. Agnello, J. B. Knudsen, M. Msellem,
K. L. Schiøler & F. Saleh
Living labs: epistemic modelling, temporariness and land value
J. Clossick, T. Khonsari & U. Steven
Living knowledge labs: creating community and inclusive nature-based solutions
J. L. Fernández-Pacheco Sáez, I. Rasskin-Gutman,
N. Martín-Bermúdez & A. Pérez-del-Campo
Co-creating justice in housing energy transitions through local living labs
D. Ricci, C. Leiwakabessy, S. van Wieringen, P. de Koning & T.
Konstantinou
Increasing civic resilience in urban living labs: city authorities’ roles
E. Alatalo, M. Laine, & M. Kyrönviita
Positive energy districts and energy communities: how living labs create value
E. Malakhatka, O. Shafqat, A. Sandoff & L. Thuvander
Co-creating urban transformation: a stakeholder analysis for Germany’s heat transition
P. Heger, C. Bieber, M. Hendawy & A. Shooshtari
Living laboratories and building testing labs: enabling climate change adaptation
J. Hugo & M. Farhadian
Decolonising time: vernacular villages and the politics of heritage temporality
R Al-Rabady
Commutes to alternative workplaces: GHG emissions and physical activity
J Taylor, L Thoen, A Espinosa Mireles De Villafranca, P Anashin, J Vanhatalo, D Milián
Bernal & I Okkonen
Nine ‘myths’ about the building stock of Great Britain
S Evans, P Steadman, A Neto-Bradley, D Humphrey, R Liddiard,H Shamsi, J Palmer & G Simons
Critical Reconstruction Theory and the invention of post-disaster response
G Lizarralde, D Wachsmuth, F Özdoğan & M Cossu
Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui’s dual disaster recovery
A Y F Urushima & K Yamaguchi
Critical reflections on the process of interdisciplinary building science research
G T Morgan, M F Touchie, J Robinson, A Jakubiec & J Tran
Comparing technical disassembly potential methods for concrete and timber buildings
N Westerholm, A Tuure, S Pajunen & M Kuittinen
One-stop shops as leverage points for renovation sufficiency
G Pardalis & M Sula
Creating resilient cities: advocacy and planning for equity-based recovery
A Paidakaki
Impact of glazed balcony design on daylight in Finnish apartments
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa & S Pelsmakers
Climate-related risks: implications for municipal governments in Brazil
C Nastari Fernandes, P Ciminelli Ramalho & F Lima-Silva
Changing land-use metrics in mass housing: Türkiye case study
M S Çepni, A K Kutluca, T Salihoğlu, A Atmaca & S Mintemur
Personal comfort systems for adults with intellectual disabilities
K Exss, M Trebilcock, P Wegertseder-Martínez, S Schiavon & H Zhang
How buildings shape occupant movement: a systematic review and framework
G Chinazzo & N Wang
Rethinking the second life of post-disaster and post-conflict temporary housing
N Akdede, B Ö Ay & İ Gürsel Dino
Embodied carbon impacts of residential development siteworks: new assessment framework
P Comerford, O Kinnane, R O’Hegarty & P Crowe
Horizontal building extensions: potential in Finnish blocks of flats
J Tarpio & P Lehtovuori
Post-disaster reconstruction and ethics: the power of social capital
B Ubesingha, G Ofori, G Agyekum-Mensah & D Frings
Towards net zero: sectoral ambitions and global trends in building decarbonisation
C E Caballero-Güereca, J Vogel, N Alaux, C M Ouellet-Plamondon, J Silva Santana, G Foliente, T Lützkendorf & A Passer
Climate literacy and labour agency in vocational education and training
J Calvert, V Price, C Winch, L Clarke, M Sahin-Dikmen, P-L Bilodeau & E Dionne
Towards a new neighbourhood-scale climate risk-adaptation approach
C Rigoni, S Oliveira, O Romice, A Moreno-Rangel & A Chatzimichali
Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks
C Foulds, S Royston, A Aggeli, A Crowther & R Robison
Environmental impacts of reclaimed bricks: comparing different deconstruction methods
E Salmio & S Huuhka
eCOMBINE: framework for energy, comfort, behaviour and a multi-domain environment
V M Barthelmes, C Karmann, V Gonzalez Serrano, K Lyu, J Wienold, M Andersen, D Licina & D Khovalyg
Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N Antaki, D Petrescu & V Marin

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
The Search for Urban Recovery in Lebanon
Lebanon’s history has been shaped by recurrent cycles of war, disaster, and economic collapse, with each episode leaving enduring imprints on the country’s urban and social fabric. Howayda al-Harithy (American University of Beirut) critically examines Lebanon’s historical cycles of destruction and reconstruction. Recovery involves more than rebuilding buildings; it requires a framework that is people-centered, heritage-led and place-specific together with an emphasis on restoring social relations, cultural identity, community agency while addressing structural inequalities.
Rebuilding Energy Infrastructure after War
Marco Nicola Binetti (University of Bremen) argues that energy reconstruction should be understood as a core pillar of post-conflict recovery rather than a narrowly technical undertaking. Restoring electricity and fuel supplies enables essential services, supports economic growth, strengthens state legitimacy, and reduces the likelihood of renewed violence. However, successful reconstruction requires overcoming substantial financial, logistical, institutional, and political obstacles. Reconstruction strategies must also adapt to emerging threats and vulnerabilities created by modern warfare.