Welcome to the B&C COMMUNITY WEBSITE | Visit the B&C JOURNAL WEBSITE

www.buildingsandcities.org/journal-content/special-issues/living-labs-agents-for-change.html

Living Labs: Agents for Change

Living Labs: Agents for Change

What are the roles and impacts that Living Labs play in increasing civic resilience and supporting ecological transition in different contexts and at different scales?

This special issue examines how living labs (LLs) build capacity among stakeholders, reshape spaces, and influence governance to support civic resilience and ecological transition.

An LL is a real-world environment where research, innovative products or services are tested and co-developed with everyday participants in a collaborative setting. In the last decade, the LL methodology has become a key method for conducting research by engaging with ecological transition. LLs offer the possibility of connecting researchers and citizens, engaging them in collective action to identify common needs, develop collaborative methods to respond to these needs and share methods for wider implementation. LLs can be a means of expanding the capacity of citizens to engage in processes of change and increased civic resilience.

Guest editors: Nicola Antaki, Doina Petrescu, Vera Marin

The various roles of LLs are examined for how they empower new and existing actors, mediate between diverse stakeholders, and foster bottom-up agency for change. LLs can provide the social, institutional and material groundwork for future change in the built environment. This special issue underscores LLs’ contribution to governance innovation, particularly engagement that brings together public authorities, industry, academia and civil society. By catalysing policy learning and multi-actor coordination, LLs can influence how transitions are organised and implemented.

LLs can be called ‘agents for change’ because they have the potential to tangibly reshape capacities, relations, spaces and systems, yielding documented transformations. They demonstrate 'change' in stakeholder capacity-building; bottom-up agency; diversification of governance; and spatial activation. Individually and collectively, papers in this special issue show that LLs can be agents of change by offering opportunities for developing civic agency, transforming space and testing/proposing modes of governance adaptation.

The special issue contributes new knowledge in terms of roles and relationships, spatial change and governance: the capacity for change with a focus on actors, roles and methods, key LL typologies; means of evaluation; and processes inside of / generated by LLs.

Table of contents

Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N. Antaki, D. Petrescu & V. Marin

Researchers’ shifting roles in living labs for knowledge co-production
C.-C. Dobre & G. Faldi

The importance of multi-roles and code-switching in living labs
H. Noller & A. Tarik

Mediation roles and ecologies within resilience-focused urban living labs
N. Antaki, D. Petrescu, M. Schalk, E. Brandao, D. Calciu & V. Marin

Co-curation as civic practice in community engagement
Z. Li, M. Sunikka-Blank, R. Purohit & F. Samuel

Youth engagement in urban living labs: tools, methods and pedagogies
N. Charalambous, C. Panayi, C. Mady, T. Augustinčić & D. Berc

A living lab approach to co-designing climate adaptation strategies
M. K. Barati & S. Bankaru-Swamy

Co-learning in living labs: nurturing civic agency and resilience
A. Belfield

Placemaking living lab: creating resilient social and spatial infrastructure
M. Dodd, N. Madabhushi & R. Lees

Urban rooms and the expanded ecology of urban living labs
E. Akbil & C. Butterworth

Expanding the framework of urban living labs using grassroots methods
T. Ahmed, I. Delsante & L. Migliavacca

Living labs: a systematic review of success parameters and outcomes
J. M. Müller

Circularity at the neighbourhood scale: co-creative living lab lessons
J. Honsa, A. Versele, T. Van de Kerckhove, & C. Piccardo

Urban living labs: relationality between institutions and local circularity
P. Palo, M. Adelfio, J. Lundin & E. Brandão

A public theatre as a living lab to create resilience
A. Apostu & M. Drăghici

Co-creating interventions to prevent mosquito-borne disease transmission in hospitals
O. Sloan Wood, E. Lupenza, D. M. Agnello, J. B. Knudsen, M. Msellem, K. L. Schiøler & F. Saleh

Living labs: epistemic modelling, temporariness and land value
J. Clossick, T. Khonsari & U. Steven

Living knowledge labs: creating community and inclusive nature-based solutions
J. L. Fernández-Pacheco Sáez, I. Rasskin-Gutman, N. Martín-Bermúdez & A. Pérez-del-Campo

Co-creating justice in housing energy transitions through local living labs
D. Ricci, C. Leiwakabessy, S. van Wieringen, P. de Koning & T. Konstantinou

Increasing civic resilience in urban living labs: city authorities’ roles
E. Alatalo, M. Laine, & M. Kyrönviita

Positive energy districts and energy communities: how living labs create value
E. Malakhatka, O. Shafqat, A. Sandoff & L. Thuvander

Co-creating urban transformation: a stakeholder analysis for Germany’s heat transition
P. Heger, C. Bieber, M. Hendawy & A. Shooshtari

Living laboratories and building testing labs: enabling climate change adaptation
J. Hugo & M. Farhadian

Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content

Journal Content

Urban form metrics for building occupancy modelling: applications and impacts
D Reiter, M Jehling & R Hecht

Retrofit realism: affordable low-carbon policies for existing homes
N Eyre & R Khosla

Inside offsite: everyday dwelling in factory-built apartments
L Dorignon & R Horne

MMC for housing: sectoral perception on governance challenges
J Morgan, C Goodier, R Schmidt-III & K Ayinla

Reorganising specification practice for component reuse: an exploratory study
S Gao, K Jones, J Xu & J Glass

Kitchen retrofits to support food practices and wellbeing
F J Andrews, A Sal Moslehian, E Warner & R Tucker

From strategy to delivery: a comparative analysis of MMC roadmaps
G Goldman, D Sorokine, F Suerich-Gulick, C Carbone & M Jemtrud

Thermal comfort, ventilation and mosquito-borne disease risk in Zanzibar hospitals
O Sloan Wood, J B Knudsen, K L Schiøler, E Lupenza, M Msellem & F Saleh

Reusing precast concrete elements in construction: assessing the economic conditions
O Vigren, H Westerlind & T Malmqvist

Institutional readiness for industrialised social housing in Vietnam
T Q Nguyen, B N Nguyen, T H Q To & Z Aziz

Prefabrication for housing retrofit: governance, innovation and resident experience
E Pikas, K Kuusk, P Pihelo, R Liias, J Pukk & T Kalamees

Reframing heat pump transitions: a care perspective
J van der Haer, R Schelwald & F de Haan

Urban informal settlements in Africa: transforming adaptation governance
K Buyana & H Sseviiri

Reusing concrete products in indoor environments: chemical hazard assessment
K Tähtinen, A Helin, E Parshintsev & H Hovi

Negotiating net-zero carbon: an ANT analysis of two buildings
L Schweber & M Green

Design for disassembly: a review of public policy proposals
O Vorobjev, U Uotila, T Joensuu & A Saari

Retrofitting Norwegian residential buildings: an archetype-based dynamic stock model
L S A Rousseau, S Amini, S Akin & E G Hertwich

Decolonising time: vernacular villages and the politics of heritage temporality
R Al-Rabady

Commutes to alternative workplaces: GHG emissions and physical activity
J Taylor, L Thoen, A Espinosa Mireles De Villafranca, P Anashin, J Vanhatalo, D Milián Bernal & I Okkonen

Nine ‘myths’ about the building stock of Great Britain
S Evans, P Steadman, A Neto-Bradley, D Humphrey, R Liddiard,H Shamsi, J Palmer & G Simons


See all peer reviewed articles

Latest Commentaries

Permitted Development housing approved without regard to the health of future residents.

The climate crisis has progressed into a dangerous phase with tragic consequences often counted in numbers of excess deaths, but also by powerful economic impacts of rising food prices, the increased costs of insurance and lending, costly damage to the built environment. Celia Davies, Director of Impact at the UK’s Town and Country Planning Association (TCPA) and  Hugh Ellis, Director of Policy at TCPA, consider the responsibilities of professionals in shaping a built environment which is fit not just for today's climate risks but for the dramatic increase in severe and unpredictable weather which is now locked into our climate systems.

Photo: Andrew Belfield

Living labs are blossoming more than ever. Their first appearances in academic literature were roughly 25 years ago. Dimitri Schuurman (Ghent University) responds to the recent Buildings & Cities special issue “Living Labs: Agents for Change” and focuses on two important drawbacks that also come with living labs booming in practice as well as in the literature.

Join Our Community

Join Our Community

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.

We will not share your email with third parties. Read more