Welcome to the B&C COMMUNITY WEBSITE | Visit the B&C JOURNAL WEBSITE

www.buildingsandcities.org/journal-content/special-issues/living-labs-agents-for-change.html

Living Labs: Agents for Change

Living Labs: Agents for Change

What are the roles and impacts that Living Labs play in increasing civic resilience and supporting ecological transition in different contexts and at different scales?

This special issue examines how living labs (LLs) build capacity among stakeholders, reshape spaces, and influence governance to support civic resilience and ecological transition.

An LL is a real-world environment where research, innovative products or services are tested and co-developed with everyday participants in a collaborative setting. In the last decade, the LL methodology has become a key method for conducting research by engaging with ecological transition. LLs offer the possibility of connecting researchers and citizens, engaging them in collective action to identify common needs, develop collaborative methods to respond to these needs and share methods for wider implementation. LLs can be a means of expanding the capacity of citizens to engage in processes of change and increased civic resilience.

Guest editors: Nicola Antaki, Doina Petrescu, Vera Marin

The various roles of LLs are examined for how they empower new and existing actors, mediate between diverse stakeholders, and foster bottom-up agency for change. LLs can provide the social, institutional and material groundwork for future change in the built environment. This special issue underscores LLs’ contribution to governance innovation, particularly engagement that brings together public authorities, industry, academia and civil society. By catalysing policy learning and multi-actor coordination, LLs can influence how transitions are organised and implemented.

LLs can be called ‘agents for change’ because they have the potential to tangibly reshape capacities, relations, spaces and systems, yielding documented transformations. They demonstrate 'change' in stakeholder capacity-building; bottom-up agency; diversification of governance; and spatial activation. Individually and collectively, papers in this special issue show that LLs can be agents of change by offering opportunities for developing civic agency, transforming space and testing/proposing modes of governance adaptation.

The special issue contributes new knowledge in terms of roles and relationships, spatial change and governance: the capacity for change with a focus on actors, roles and methods, key LL typologies; means of evaluation; and processes inside of / generated by LLs.

Table of contents

Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N. Antaki, D. Petrescu & V. Marin

Researchers’ shifting roles in living labs for knowledge co-production
C.-C. Dobre & G. Faldi

The importance of multi-roles and code-switching in living labs
H. Noller & A. Tarik

Mediation roles and ecologies within resilience-focused urban living labs
N. Antaki, D. Petrescu, M. Schalk, E. Brandao, D. Calciu & V. Marin

Co-curation as civic practice in community engagement
Z. Li, M. Sunikka-Blank, R. Purohit & F. Samuel

Youth engagement in urban living labs: tools, methods and pedagogies
N. Charalambous, C. Panayi, C. Mady, T. Augustinčić & D. Berc

A living lab approach to co-designing climate adaptation strategies
M. K. Barati & S. Bankaru-Swamy

Co-learning in living labs: nurturing civic agency and resilience
A. Belfield

Placemaking living lab: creating resilient social and spatial infrastructure
M. Dodd, N. Madabhushi & R. Lees

Urban rooms and the expanded ecology of urban living labs
E. Akbil & C. Butterworth

Expanding the framework of urban living labs using grassroots methods
T. Ahmed, I. Delsante & L. Migliavacca

Living labs: a systematic review of success parameters and outcomes
J. M. Müller

Circularity at the neighbourhood scale: co-creative living lab lessons
J. Honsa, A. Versele, T. Van de Kerckhove, & C. Piccardo

Urban living labs: relationality between institutions and local circularity
P. Palo, M. Adelfio, J. Lundin & E. Brandão

A public theatre as a living lab to create resilience
A. Apostu & M. Drăghici

Co-creating interventions to prevent mosquito-borne disease transmission in hospitals
O. Sloan Wood, E. Lupenza, D. M. Agnello, J. B. Knudsen, M. Msellem, K. L. Schiøler & F. Saleh

Living labs: epistemic modelling, temporariness and land value
J. Clossick, T. Khonsari & U. Steven

Living knowledge labs: creating community and inclusive nature-based solutions
J. L. Fernández-Pacheco Sáez, I. Rasskin-Gutman, N. Martín-Bermúdez & A. Pérez-del-Campo

Co-creating justice in housing energy transitions through local living labs
D. Ricci, C. Leiwakabessy, S. van Wieringen, P. de Koning & T. Konstantinou

Increasing civic resilience in urban living labs: city authorities’ roles
E. Alatalo, M. Laine, & M. Kyrönviita

Positive energy districts and energy communities: how living labs create value
E. Malakhatka, O. Shafqat, A. Sandoff & L. Thuvander

Co-creating urban transformation: a stakeholder analysis for Germany’s heat transition
P. Heger, C. Bieber, M. Hendawy & A. Shooshtari

Living laboratories and building testing labs: enabling climate change adaptation
J. Hugo & M. Farhadian

Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content

Journal Content

Reorganising specification practice for component reuse: an exploratory study
S Gao, K Jones, J Xu & J Glass

Kitchen retrofits to support food practices and wellbeing
F J Andrews, A Sal Moslehian, E Warner & R Tucker

From strategy to delivery: a comparative analysis of MMC roadmaps
G Goldman, D Sorokine, F Suerich-Gulick, C Carbone & M Jemtrud

Thermal comfort, ventilation and mosquito-borne disease risk in Zanzibar hospitals
O Sloan Wood, J B Knudsen, K L Schiøler, E Lupenza, M Msellem & F Saleh

Reusing precast concrete elements in construction: assessing the economic conditions
O Vigren, H Westerlind & T Malmqvist

Institutional readiness for industrialised social housing in Vietnam
T Q Nguyen, B N Nguyen, T H Q To & Z Aziz

Prefabrication for housing retrofit: governance, innovation and resident experience
E Pikas, K Kuusk, P Pihelo, R Liias, J Pukk & T Kalamees

Reframing heat pump transitions: a care perspective
J van der Haer, R Schelwald & F de Haan

Urban informal settlements in Africa: transforming adaptation governance
K Buyana & H Sseviiri

Reusing concrete products in indoor environments: chemical hazard assessment
K Tähtinen, A Helin, E Parshintsev & H Hovi

Negotiating net-zero carbon: an ANT analysis of two buildings
L Schweber & M Green

Design for disassembly: a review of public policy proposals
O Vorobjev, U Uotila, T Joensuu & A Saari

Retrofitting Norwegian residential buildings: an archetype-based dynamic stock model
L S A Rousseau, S Amini, S Akin & E G Hertwich

Decolonising time: vernacular villages and the politics of heritage temporality
R Al-Rabady

Commutes to alternative workplaces: GHG emissions and physical activity
J Taylor, L Thoen, A Espinosa Mireles De Villafranca, P Anashin, J Vanhatalo, D Milián Bernal & I Okkonen

Nine ‘myths’ about the building stock of Great Britain
S Evans, P Steadman, A Neto-Bradley, D Humphrey, R Liddiard,H Shamsi, J Palmer & G Simons

Critical Reconstruction Theory and the invention of post-disaster response
G Lizarralde, D Wachsmuth, F Özdoğan & M Cossu

Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui’s dual disaster recovery
A Y F Urushima & K Yamaguchi

See all peer reviewed articles

Latest Commentaries

Climate protest outside a local library. Many protests forced councils to declare Climate Emergencies. But have the councils delivered on this promise? Photo: (c) Joe Baker (2019)

How can local authorities better anticipate and reduce chronic climate risks in the built environment? With 20 years' experience working in local authorities tackling climate change, Joe Baker considers the challenges facing local authorities to identify and manage climate risks, and asks: How do we get the leadership, skills, capacity and meaningful action needed?

Sao Paolo, Brazil. Image: Google Earth. Map data: Google Landsat / Copernicus Data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO. Imagery from the dates: 14/12/2015 – 01/01/2021.

At the 2026 Sustainable Buildings and Construction Summit Magnus Andersson, David Muthui & Reza Roodaki (Malmö University) argued that remote sensing should be a core evidence infrastructure for sustainable urban governance. Satellite derived and geospatial analysis can observe and monitor urban expansion, densification, land consumption, building form and material demand across jurisdictions and over time. A shift from two-dimensional to three-dimensional sensing and analysis provides new data to inform policies for housing, land-use efficiency, disaster exposure, public space, resource efficiency and resilient construction.

Join Our Community

Join Our Community

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.

We will not share your email with third parties. Read more