Edited by Daniel Sage and Chloé Vitry. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, ISBN: 9783319739960.Faye Wade (University of Edinburgh) reviews this book which explores how social science theories can be developed through studies of construction.
This book addresses a disciplinary disconnect in studies of building construction, which:
“remains a comparably seldom visited object of analysis for academics based within social science and humanities departments…Equally, social science and humanities studies that do theorise with building construction often remain overlooked within the fields of construction engineering and management” (p.4)
Sage and Vitry set out to cross-fertilise the work of construction management and engineering scholars with social science and humanities scholars. Their intent is to provide scholars with new concepts, methodologies and empirical directions to understand construction. The book includes insights from three disciplines: sociology, human geography and history but other social science disciplines e.g. anthropology, philosophy and psychology are missing. Nonetheless, the approaches included usefully showcase the results when construction is relocated ‘as a richer object of knowledge for human societies’ (p.6). Specifically, the book seeks to encourage the development of theory through studies of construction (rather than straightforward application).
The Introduction’s historical account provides useful framing for how labour and craftwork has been distinguished from, and identified as inferior to, the work of building design and engineering. This has significant implications for the prioritisation of ‘design’ work over construction work (in both professional training and research), and the interactions between both. Construction has typically been conceived as serving technical, managerial, physical and financial ends, rather than social ones. The book’s subsequent chapters challenge these conceptualisations. The diverse chapters each provide theoretical ideas to develop through wide ranging studies of construction. Four key themes emerging on my reading of the book are: the inclusion of construction workers; buildings as ‘always in the making’; instability; power and marketization.
The first theme of the inclusion of construction workers is particularly apparent in Paskins’ (Chapter 3) history of 1960s urban transformation in Paris. Drawing on archival material, Paskins explores the role of construction work in debates around national identity, labour immigration and workers’ rights. Paradoxically, construction workers themselves were often overlooked in public discourse around the transformation. Such historical understandings are needed to inform current debates. To tackle concerns about poor work safety records and improve literacy standards, French language lessons were provided to foreign workers on large building sites. Contemporary debates about multi-national construction teams, limited language ability and subsequent health and safety on construction sites remain a present concern. This begs the question why teaching languages has not become a norm in construction in the past 70 years.
Similarly moving from an organisational level to consideration of the individual, Sandberg, Räisänen, Löwstedt and Raiden (Chapter 4) use interviewing, observation and storytelling to explore how a female site manager conducts her everyday work. The authors do not set out to study gender per se, but through a focus on the participant’s performance of work, they identify that the fast-moving nature of construction site work, combined with class-bound identities contribute as much to the bodily work of construction as prevalent ideas of gender. This is the only chapter that considers gender; this book could have contained more on how social theory can support, and be developed through, studies of gender and diversity in construction. However, with regard to inclusivity Chan (Chapter 5) also highlights that existing work in construction management has focused on professional elites, with a neglect of accounts of the work done on sites themselves. Chan identifies three new lines of inquiry to develop institutional theory using the construction industry as a setting: processes of change; more inclusive scholarship and practice; demise.
This final line of inquiry fits within the
second theme: buildings are always in the making. Indeed, as people
and organisations occupy buildings, they have a key role in ‘making’ the
building through operation and subtle transformations (Green & Seegova,
2020). As buildings often outlive their original purpose, Chan (Chapter 5) explores
how theories of institutional change can be used to study the re-purposing of
buildings. Patel and Tutt (Chapter 2) develop theoretical understandings of
enactment, specifically seeking to understand the ‘generative consumption’ of a
building through ethnography and historiography of a university library.
Significantly, they note that very few academic studies or performance
monitoring includes revisiting buildings
beyond five years of their construction. They conclude that research frameworks
need to look beyond notions of fixity, towards acknowledging the flexibility
and heterogeneous nature of buildings over time.
Continuing this theme, Grubbauer (Chapter 6)
focuses on informal settlements which are ‘under permanent construction’ in
Mexico City. There is a reliance on informal networks amongst these
‘self-builders’ for materials and skills. Although informal settlements
typically rely on informal networks of ‘self-builders’, this chapter studies
architects from a non-profit enterprise helping residents to remodel their
homes. In addition, this is the only contribution that is not set in a UK or EU
country. Further scholarship is needed to explore how the social theories
identified in this collection play out in construction projects and buildings
in more informal settlements, and densely populated cities in Asia, Africa, the
Middle East, Central and South America.
As Patel and Tutt note, studies of how
buildings are adapted throughout their lifetimes can provide new knowledge for designing for adaptability. The value of
the approaches outlined in this book for developing these understandings is
particularly apparent at the current time, whilst people are struggling to
adapt their homes and workplaces to manage the threat of coronavirus, climate
Chan (Chapter 5) also advocates for the use
of institutionalism to question the ‘seemingly stable conceptualisation of the
construction industry’ (p.152), linking to the third recurring theme: instability. In particular, institutional
norms can be crucial in shaping change, and resistance to it, within
construction. Chan’s approach is valuable for future studies seeking to understand
efforts to encourage the development of more sustainable buildings, and
increase productivity in construction through the introduction of digital
Often overlooked in explorations of
instability is wildlife. Sage, Justesen,
Dainty, Tryggestad & Mouritsen (Chapter 8) explore the boundary work taking
place between humans and nature in two cases: an infrastructure project in the
UK and a housebuilding project in Scandinavia. Using actor network theory (ANT),
they develop notions of exclusion, invitation and disturbance through examples including the discovery of a badger
sett along a planned pipeline resulting in pipeline re-routing with an
additional cost of £500,000 to the project. The ideas developed are useful for
exploring change and instability in the planning and development of
A fourth theme, power and marketization, is particularly apparent in Sage and
Vitry’s (Chapter 7) development of ANT and theories of place through the highly
standardised context of UK volume housebuilding. Housebuilders are formally
encouraged in national planning policy to establish a sense of place. However,
profit maximisation drives design standardization and results in singular,
stereotypical images of place. Similar motivations were revealed in Grubbauer’s
study in Mexico City. This argued that materialities of construction and
meanings of home in informal building practices are shaped by powerful
processes of marketization as national and international building suppliers and
retailers target the market of self-help housing.
With its call to use construction as a site for the development of social theory, the text is primarily aimed at an academic audience. However, in pursuing this aim, the book demonstrates the value of social science for understanding construction processes. Such insights are crucial for exposing ways in which industry and policy makers can usefully engage with construction processes and practitioners to create a healthy and sustainable built environment.
Green, S. D., & Sergeeva, N. (2020). The contested privileging of zero carbon: plausibility, persuasiveness and professionalism. Buildings and Cities, 1(1), 491–503. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/bc.49
Climate action at the neighbourhood scale: Comparing municipal future scenarios
Y Lu, C Girling, N Martino, J Kim, R Kellett & J Salter
Transformational climate actions by cities [editorial]
K R Slater & J B Robinson
Heat stress: adaptation measures in South African informal settlements
J M Hugo
The urban expansion of Berlin, 1862–1900: Hobrecht’s Plan
Common sources of occupant dissatisfaction with workspace environments in 600 office buildings
T Parkinson, S Schiavon, J Kim & G Betti
Collapse and Catastrophe: The Need to Protect Inhabitants
In light of the recent earthquakes in Turkey and Syria, David Oswald and Trivess Moore (RMIT University) reflect on the rights that inhabitants have for buildings to be safe, healthy, comfortable and robust. However, serial and various failings in the construction supply side and its oversight by governments mean greater accountability is needed.
Blind Spots in Energy Policy
As a policy practitioner who leads a national organisation representing households and small businesses in shaping the future of Australia’s energy system, Lynne Gallagher (Energy Consumers Australia) responds to the Buildings & Cities special issue, Energy, Emerging Technologies and Gender in Homes. Insights from lived experience reveal blind spots in the design, provision and use of smart tech that adversely affect energy outcomes.