Welcome to the B&C COMMUNITY WEBSITE | Visit the B&C JOURNAL WEBSITE

www.buildingsandcities.org/insights/news/richard-bender.html

Remembering Richard Bender

Remembering Richard Bender

Andrew Rabeneck reflects on the recent passing of Richard Bender, dean emeritus of the College of Environmental Design, University of California Berkeley

Professor Richard Bender (1930 - 2022) was an educator, architect and planner with a practice specializing in urban and community planning, town planning, campus planning and the planning and replanning of obsolete and damaged industrial and waste sites.

I met first Richard (Dick) Bender in 1969 in Berkeley - we became lifelong friends. He was a Harvard-educated architect and planner who had been teaching at Cooper Union in New York. Gerald McCue, then chair of the University of California Berkeley's College of Environmental Design (CED), recruited him to come to teach at CED.  McCue had succeeded the architect Charles Moore who, although he had attracted some wonderful teaching staff including Ezra Ehrenkrantz, Christopher Alexander, Horst Rittel and others, was not a strong manager, and the school was getting big and unwieldy; it needed firm and imaginative management. Dick was soon appointed chair of architecture and then dean of CED, where he skillfully and sympathetically kept the unruly faculty mostly on side. He and his wife Sue brought a strong whiff of East Coast sophistication to laid back Berkeley.

Dick was particularly impressed with Ehrenkrantz's bold initiatives to reshape America's building industry on which I too was working. Dick was on the National Commission on Urban Problems and New York Mayor Lindsay's housing task force, making him a strong ally for Ehrenkrantz in gaining the attention of Housing and Urban Developent (HUD) and other government organisations such as the Institute for Applied Technology at the then National Bureau of Standards, then headed by Donald Schon. Dick became a valuable adviser to Ehrenkrantz throughout George Romney's (Secretary of State at HUD 1969-73) ill-fated Operation Breakthrough program.1

Later during the 1980s and 1990s, after I had returned from America, Dick would often come to London in his capacity as "GC-5" Professor of Urban Design and Construction at Tokyo University. The position was funded by Japan's largest contractors, and they visited to understand what was happening at Canary Wharf and in the City of London. We also stayed in touch through John Parman who worked closely with Dick as he or they consulted or advised on master plans for University of California campuses, including Berkeley, Davis, Merced, San Diego and Santa Cruz. Dick, John, and Emily Marthinsen, the former Berkeley Campus Architect, wrote extensively on Berkeley as a university city. (John Parman was also the co-founder and publisher of the Design Book Review2 to which I contributed quite frequently.)

Dick's unique gift was a strong diagnostic sense, like a great doctor. He could quickly understand the essence of a plan or project and then give sound advice that people were happy to take on board. He frequently spotted things others overlooked, particularly about a project's impact on the surrounding city. He became a valued contributor to selection panels for important projects both in Japan and in America, such as the Getty Centre in Los Angeles.

I visited with Dick and Sue on yearly visits to the Bay Area, until 2019. We kept up a vigorous correspondence about technology and the globalisation of construction until just last year. I shall miss him very much, as will a worldwide network of "friends of RB," including students from Berkeley and Cooper Union, and collaborators sharing his many interests.

Notes

1. Bender, R. & Wilson, F. (1973). A Crack in the Rear View Mirror: A View of Industrialized Housing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. This book unpicks the Operation Breakthrough program in a perceptive way, analysing various attempts at industrialised housing.

2. Design Book Review https://johnjparman.medium.com/re-design-book-review-1983-2002-4dd0bc4859dd

Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content

Journal Content

Retrofitting Norwegian residential buildings: an archetype-based dynamic stock model
L S A Rousseau, S Amini, S Akin & E G Hertwich

Decolonising time: vernacular villages and the politics of heritage temporality
R Al-Rabady

Commutes to alternative workplaces: GHG emissions and physical activity
J Taylor, L Thoen, A Espinosa Mireles De Villafranca, P Anashin, J Vanhatalo, D Milián Bernal & I Okkonen

Nine ‘myths’ about the building stock of Great Britain
S Evans, P Steadman, A Neto-Bradley, D Humphrey, R Liddiard,H Shamsi, J Palmer & G Simons

Critical Reconstruction Theory and the invention of post-disaster response
G Lizarralde, D Wachsmuth, F Özdoğan & M Cossu

Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui’s dual disaster recovery
A Y F Urushima & K Yamaguchi

Critical reflections on the process of interdisciplinary building science research
G T Morgan, M F Touchie, J Robinson, A Jakubiec & J Tran

Comparing technical disassembly potential methods for concrete and timber buildings
N Westerholm, A Tuure, S Pajunen & M Kuittinen

One-stop shops as leverage points for renovation sufficiency
G Pardalis & M Sula

Creating resilient cities: advocacy and planning for equity-based recovery
A Paidakaki

Impact of glazed balcony design on daylight in Finnish apartments
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa & S Pelsmakers

Climate-related risks: implications for municipal governments in Brazil
C Nastari Fernandes, P Ciminelli Ramalho & F Lima-Silva

Changing land-use metrics in mass housing: Türkiye case study
M S Çepni, A K Kutluca, T Salihoğlu, A Atmaca & S Mintemur

Personal comfort systems for adults with intellectual disabilities
K Exss, M Trebilcock, P Wegertseder-Martínez, S Schiavon & H Zhang

How buildings shape occupant movement: a systematic review and framework
G Chinazzo & N Wang

Rethinking the second life of post-disaster and post-conflict temporary housing
N Akdede, B Ö Ay & İ Gürsel Dino

Embodied carbon impacts of residential development siteworks: new assessment framework
P Comerford, O Kinnane, R O’Hegarty & P Crowe

Horizontal building extensions: potential in Finnish blocks of flats
J Tarpio & P Lehtovuori

Post-disaster reconstruction and ethics: the power of social capital
B Ubesingha, G Ofori, G Agyekum-Mensah & D Frings

Towards net zero: sectoral ambitions and global trends in building decarbonisation
C E Caballero-Güereca, J Vogel, N Alaux, C M Ouellet-Plamondon, J Silva Santana, G Foliente, T Lützkendorf & A Passer

Climate literacy and labour agency in vocational education and training
J Calvert, V Price, C Winch, L Clarke, M Sahin-Dikmen, P-L Bilodeau & E Dionne

Towards a new neighbourhood-scale climate risk-adaptation approach
C Rigoni, S Oliveira, O Romice, A Moreno-Rangel & A Chatzimichali

Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks
C Foulds, S Royston, A Aggeli, A Crowther & R Robison

Environmental impacts of reclaimed bricks: comparing different deconstruction methods
E Salmio & S Huuhka

eCOMBINE: framework for energy, comfort, behaviour and a multi-domain environment
V M Barthelmes, C Karmann, V Gonzalez Serrano, K Lyu, J Wienold, M Andersen, D Licina & D Khovalyg

Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N Antaki, D Petrescu & V Marin

See all peer reviewed articles

Latest Commentaries

Disaster Reconstruction: Practitioner Insights Improve Outcomes

Regan Potangaroa (Auckland University of Technology - AUT), Kelvin Zuo (Massey University), Suzanne Wilkinson (AUT) explain why experience-led knowledge from the field, when triangulated with contemporaneous documentation, can constitute evidence for understanding post-disaster reconstruction systems. People working within reconstruction environments (engineers, builders, logisticians and community actors) provide crucial observations about how reconstruction systems function in practice, particularly supply chains, material flows, procurement and governance in post-disaster rebuilding. Integrating this knowledge can lead to better outcomes.

Preparedness for Recovery

Kristen MacAskill (University of Cambridge) and Lianne Dalziel (University of Canterbury) explain capabilities (and the associated capacity) are essential for preparedness. Capacity for both physical infrastructure and organisational / institutional response are necessary. This commentary focuses primarily on institutional capacity for disaster risk management, and the positive (if slow) developments in the value that is being placed on preparedness.

Join Our Community

Join Our Community

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.

We will not share your email with third parties. Read more