A wide, coordinated set of policy proposals for built environment is launched for tackling global warming and biodiversity.
The UK built and natural environment think tank, the Edge, has drawn on the widespread expertise of its members to produce a concise set of interconnected policy recommendations aimed at enabling the design, construction and property industries to deliver on their obligations in the face of the twin climate change and biodiversity emergencies. The policy proposals are an urgent Call to Action to prevent on-going environmental and social harm.
Organised under 8 headings, ranging from the broad to the tightly focused, each section is typically the responsibility of a different government department or part of the industry, the proposals describe how the built and natural environment sector can and must change. To succeed nearly all of the proposals need to be acted on together and with the greatest urgency. They cannot and should not be cherry picked or delayed.
The intended audience is busy, and often distracted, policy and decision makers and, in consequence, the document is written to be as accessible and straightforward to grasp as possible with each proposal usually just a single sentence. This means that the very necessary detail, deliberation, research and references required to back them up are missing and the Edge intends to publish a follow up document, with fuller information and detailed arguments for the propositions, later in 2023.
The focus is on the UK industry and government, both local and national, but the great majority of the proposals are applicable globally.
The 8 thematic sections are as follows:
1. An economy that supports the
environment
There
is an urgent need to restructure the economy to one that that actively supports
the environment, including a reform of tax structures to support good behaviour
and penalise bad. A tax on carbon and other pollutants produced by products and
services should replace Value Added Tax at a revenue neutral rate. Incentives are
also required to reward carbon reduction, biodiversity net-gain, minimising the
use of virgin resource and enabling circular economy businesses and projects.
Utility providers should be reinvented as public interest organisations charged
with driving forward the net zero carbon agenda.
2. Planning for the benefit of
society as a whole
Planning
and planning policy must be re-focused on achieving social value with
measurable and monitored objectives applied to achieving a range of core social,
economic and environmental goals. Planning policy must be required to take the
needs of future generations into consideration and should flow seamlessly into
other aspects of design and construction including building regulations, health
and safety practice and facilities management to achieve the ‘golden thread’
that connects decision-making on projects throughout their life cycle.
3. Using our limited land
intelligently and productively
Using our limited land and natural resources well is critical for delivering on
social and environmental objective, whether good housing and employment or
clean air and access to open space. A coherent land use strategy that balances
conflicting requirements for the British Isles is long overdue and should help
drive a wide range of public goods including equitable and fair access, healthy
and safe environments, greater biodiversity and food, energy and energy
security.
4. Delivering essential
infrastructure and transport
The
provision of essential infrastructure and transport is required to support a
future equitable and low carbon society and economy, fairly balancing
availability and distribution of public provision, but it needs to be
configured to encourage maximum resource and energy responsibility and
accountability.
5. Building climate and
biodiversity skills and understanding
Without
clear understanding, motivation and relevant skills across all sectors of
society it will be impossible to cope adequately with the climate and
biodiversity emergencies. All stages of education from primary to tertiary must
help deliver the skills that will enable individuals and communities to
flourish in the decades ahead.
6. Measuring, declaring and
eradicating carbon emissions
The
construction and property management sectors need to routinely measure and
declare carbon emissions, en route to eliminating them. Building owners should
be required to plan for and manage an ever-shrinking carbon budget
7. Creating a resilient built and
natural environment
Climate
change and biodiversity loss are already with us and measures must be taken to
cope with and moderate their impact if cities and urban areas are to remain
liveable. These include the widespread
application of nature-based solutions and ensuring the resilience of essential
systems.
8. Design and construction acting
in the public interest
Finally, the
construction and property industries need to take responsibility for
eliminating their large (40%+) proportion of national carbon emissions. Building
passports that provide essential data and contractual performance guarantees should
become the norm.
The document is freely available at https://edgedebate.com/s/theEdge_PolicyProposals_1122.pdf. Hard copies are also available on request via the Edge's website.
The
Edge welcomes discussion and debate on these topics and will be arranging
public sessions in the months ahead to do just that. Alternative propositions
are very welcome.
Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets
L Hvid Horup, P K Ohms, M Hauschild, S R B Gummidi, A Q Secher, C Thuesen, M Ryberg
Equity and justice in urban coastal adaptation planning: new evaluation framework
T Okamoto & A Doyon
Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey
Suburban climate adaptation governance: assumptions and imaginaries affecting peripheral municipalities
L Cerrada Morato
Urban shrinkage as a catalyst for transformative adaptation
L Mabon, M Sato & N Mabon
Maintaining a city against nature: climate adaptation in Beira
J Schubert
Ventilation regulations and occupant practices: undetectable pollution and invisible extraction
J Few, M Shipworth & C Elwell
Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar
How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang
Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow
Gender and the heat pump transition
J Crawley, F Wade & M de Wilde
Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson
Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka
Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves
European building passports: developments, challenges and future roles
M Buchholz & T Lützkendorf
Decision-support for selecting demolition waste management strategies
M van den Berg, L Hulsbeek & H Voordijk
Assessing social value in housing design: contributions of the capability approach
J-C Dissart & L Ricaurte
Electricity consumption in commercial buildings during Covid-19
G P Duggan, P Bauleo, M Authier, P A Aloise-Young, J Care & D Zimmerle
Disruptive data: historicising the platformisation of Dublin’s taxi industry
J White & S Larsson
Impact of 2050 tree shading strategies on building cooling demands
A Czekajlo, J Alva, J Szeto, C Girling & R Kellett
Social values and social infrastructures: a multi-perspective approach to place
A Legeby & C Pech
Resilience of racialized segregation is an ecological factor: Baltimore case study
S T A Pickett, J M Grove, C G Boone & G L Buckley
Latest Commentaries
Time to Question Demolition!
André Thomsen (Delft University of Technology) comments on the recent Buildings & Cities special issue ‘Understanding Demolition’ and explains why this phenomenon is only beginning to be understood more fully as a social and behavioural set of issues. Do we need an epidemiology of different demolition rates?
Where are Women of Colour in Urban Planning?
Safaa Charafi asks: is it possible to decolonialise the planning profession to create more inclusive and egalitarian urban settings? It is widely accepted that cities are built by men for other men. This male domination in urban planning results in cities that often do not adequately address challenges encountered by women or ethnic and social minorities. Although efforts are being taken to include women in urban planning, women of colour are still under-represented in many countries, resulting in cities that often overlook their needs.