RESEARCHERS DECLARE! A series of specific recommendations for action were recently created by the research community for policymakers, industry and society.
These recommendations and actions focus on the assessment and reduction of environmental & climate impacts and resource consumption over the life cycle of buildings.
Rolf Frischknecht (Treeze Ltd) and Thomas Lützkendorf (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) introduce the Monte Verità Declaration and discuss some of its implications for those working in the built environment.
Given the urgency of the climate crisis and the need for coordinated action, an expert group  of more than 40 researchers from 20 countries agreed on a wide set of recommendations which support policy, industry and society in reaching net zero GHG emissions. The recommendations are targeted on a wide range of actors: governments and administrations; investors, financial institutions; research organisations; designers, architects and engineers; operators of EPD programs, sector specific LCA databases, certification schemes and labels; construction product and building technology manufacturers; construction companies; real estate agents; as well as users and tenants of buildings.
The Monte Verità Declaration (IEA EBC Annex 72 experts 2021) and its recommendations focus on the assessment and reduction of environmental impacts and resource consumption over the life cycle of buildings. This is the core topic of the experts and their research institutes co-operating in IEA EBC Annex 72. While the declaration has a special focus on GHG emissions and related impacts on global environment, further environmental impacts include the use and depletion of natural resources and impacts on local environment are also addressed to avoid burden shifting.
The Monte Verità Declaration builds on the Graz Declaration of Climate Protection in the Built Environment (SBE19 2019) by providing specific recommendations for action.
One of the key recommendations, addressed to governments and administration, is the introduction of legally binding requirements to limit GHG-emissions of new constructions and of refurbishments by 2025 latest with a roadmap to net zero emissions by 2035. The recommendation is to enlarge the regulation of GHGs from operational energy to include embodied emissions from the supply chain and to cover the full life cycle of the building (see also Lützkendorf & Frischknecht 2020; Satola et al. 2021).
Transparency and directionality are needed in the area of balancing and compensation. Existing approaches differ in the level of ambition. Some countries and labelling schemes assume that exported energy (e.g. electricity from photovoltaics attached to buildings) reduces electricity generated from fossil fuels and those potentially avoided emissions may be used to compensate the GHG emissions of those buildings. Others recommend to buy CO2 emission certificates to compensate for the remaining GHG emissions of the building. In accounting terms both approaches are – from point of view of the authors of this contribution - likely to lead to increased GHG emissions elsewhere. A third option is to invest in negative emission technologies which remove CO2 from the atmosphere or biogenic CO2 from flue gases and permanently sequester it. While this option would allow for truly net zero buildings it is technically not yet proven at large scales.
Is the request for the introduction of legally binding requirements until 2025 with a decarbonisation path until 2035 realistic? Yes, some activities are going already in this direction. Several European countries introduced or will soon introduce binding requirements to limit the GHG emissions over the life cycle of buildings. This legislative process shall be and is being supported by parallel activities, in particular the supply and testing of LCA databases and design tools, the education and training of the actors involved as well as the revision of real estate tools (valuation, tenancy laws). All actors, including manufacturers and suppliers, investors, designers and educators are dependent on an early publication of a binding reduction pathway from 2025 to 2035. Some actors may need reliable funding programmes to help make the transition.
While some countries have clear and practical rules, certified design tools and reliable LCA data available, others are in need of these resources.
Without compromising the urgent need for legally binding requirements and a reduction path to net zero GHG emissions by 2035, from point of view of the authors the following questions among others require further refinement of the modelling and assessment rules:
The authors recommend to go even beyond the contents of the Monte Verità Declaration and address these topics. They are convinced that the research community has an important, urgent role to provide clear evidence.
 Visit https://annex72.iea-ebc.org/ for further information about the experts involved and for guidelines and recommendations (expected to be published in late 2022).
Frischknecht R., Birgisdottir H., Chae C.U., Lützkendorf T. and Passer A. (2019). IEA EBC Annex 72 - Assessing life cycle related environmental impacts caused by buildings – targets and tasks. In: Proceedings of Sustainable Built Environment D-A-CH Conference 2019, Graz, Austria. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 323, 012042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012042.
IEA (2021) Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. Paris: International Energy Agency.
IEA EBC Annex 72 Experts (2021). The Monte Verità Declaration on a Built Environment within Planetary Boundaries. IEA EBC Annex 72 experts, Monte Verità, Ticino, Switzerland.
Lützkendorf T. and Frischknecht R. (2020). (Net-) zero-emission buildings: a typology of terms and definitions. Buildings and Cities, 1(1), pp. 662–675, http://doi.org/10.5334/bc.66.
Satola D., Balouktsi M., Lützkendorf T., Houlihan Wiberg A. and Gustavsen A. (2021). How to define (net) zero greenhouse gas emissions buildings: the results of an international survey as part of IEA EBC annex 72. Building and Environment, 107619. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107619
SBE19. (2019). Graz Declaration for Climate Protection in the Built Environment. In: Proceedings of the Sustainable Built Environment D-A-CH Conference 2019. (11-14 September 2019). Graz: Graz University of Technology.
An alternative approach to delivering safe, sustainable surgical theatre environments
C A Short, A W Woods, L Drumright, R Zia & N Mingotti
Integrating low energy cooling & ventilation strategies in Indian residences
M J Cook, Y Shukla, R Rawal, C Angelopoulos, L Caruggi-De-Faria, D Loveday, E Spentzou, & J Patel
Balconies as adaptable spaces in apartment housing
T Peters & S Masoudinejad
Residential geothermal air-conditioning: inhabitants’ comfort, behaviour and energy use
L Thomas, A Woods, R Powles, P Kalali, & S Wilkinson
Energy retrofit and passive cooling: overheating and air quality in primary schools
D Grassie, Y Schwartz, P Symonds, I Korolija, A Mavrogianni & D Mumovic
Outdoor PM2.5 air filtration: optimising indoor air quality and energy
E Belias & D Licina
Architects’ ‘enforced togetherness’: new design affordances of the home
E Marco, M Tahsiri, D Sinnett & S Oliveira
Overheating assessment in Passivhaus dwellings: the influence of prediction tools
V L Goncalves, V Costanzo, K Fabbri & T Rakha
The use of apartment balconies: context, design & social norms
M Smektała & M Baborska-Narożny
Sharing a home under lockdown in London
F Blanc & K Scanlon
Projected climate data for building design: barriers to use
P Rastogi, A Laxo, L Cecil &D Overbey
Residents’ views on adaptable housing: a virtual reality-based study
J Tarpio & S Huuhka
Technological transitions in climate control: lessons from the House of Lords
Internal thermal mass for passive cooling and ventilation: adaptive comfort limits, ideal quantities, embodied carbon
T de Toldi, S Craig & L Sushama
Understanding air-conditioned lives: qualitative insights from Doha
Living with air-conditioning: experiences in Dubai, Chongqing & London
N Murtagh, S Badi, Y Shi, S Wei, W Yu
Air-conditioning in New Zealand: power and policy
H Byrd, S Matthewman & E Rasheed
Summertime overheating in UK homes: is there a safe haven?
P Drury, S Watson & K J Lomas
Survey study on energy use in UK homes during Covid-19
G M Huebner, N E Watson, K Direk, E McKenna, E Webborn, F Hollick, S Elam & T Oreszczyn
Ceiling-fan-integrated air-conditioning: thermal comfort evaluations
M Luo, H Zhang, Z Wang, E Arens, W Chen, F S Bauman & P Raftery
The future of IEQ in green building certifications
D Licina, P Wargocki, C Pyke & S Altomonte
The significance of urban systems on sustainability and public health [editorial]
J Taylor & P Howden-Chapman
Empowered by planning law: unintended outcomes in the Helsinki region
A Joutsiniemi, M Vaattovaara & J Airaksinen
Climate change projections for sustainable and healthy cities
C Goodess, S Berk, S B Ratna, O Brousse, M Davies, C Heaviside, G Moore & H Pineo
Retrofit at scale: accelerating capabilities for domestic building stocks [editorial]
F Wade & H J Visscher
Philip Steadman (University College London) has authored a dozen books over 50 years. Reflecting on his own experiences, he offers some advice to new authors planning to publish books about architecture and building.
Philip Steadman (University College London) revisits and critiques this influential book by Christopher Alexander (1936-2022). Its method relies in part on the mathematics of set and graph theory, together with a computer technique for analysing complex systems and dividing them into their component sub-systems.