By Mahendra Gooroochurn (University of Mauritius)
COP27 has special significance for the African continent which has the lowest carbon emissions and is predicted to have high economic growth over the next decade. For this growth to take a different, more sustainable path, it is crucial to involve and empower local communities in decision-making and delivery. Grassroots level actions can help to deliver climate solutions.
The major concern highlighted in previous UN Conference of the Parties (COPs) is the lack of practical implementation of policies at grassroots level. This explains climate activists’ discontentment. Policies put forward by world leaders are often insufficiently supported with concrete plans and programmes to achieve them. Vyas et al. (2022) recommend a framework to monitor and evaluate the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). They stress the importance of government-community partnerships for delivery. The crucial role of community engagement, including personal climate action, is emphasised by Godsmark (2022), while Ballard et al. (2021) noted the beneficial development of civic engagement skills through climate action initiatives for young people, further recommended by Macdonald et al. (2013).
If climate action is to succeed, then solutions need to be co-created with the members of the community. A wealth of traditional practices can be moblised to tackle the pressing issues e.g. flooding, barren land, pests and weather extremes (Singh et al. 2022). Effective climate action is multi-faceted and involves several factors:
To deliver climate action, government-community partnership is essential. Three recommended initiatives are:
A good example of a community outreach project undertaken in Mauritius is the circular homes concept (Gooroochurn 2022). Research deliverables were simplified and a practical example was used to educate and empower the local community. The circular homes concept evolved from feedback received from the young people on their climate change perspectives and apprehension. The three pillars of the circular economy (CE) framework were applied (Figure 1) and were very effective in community outreach workshops by raising awareness on sustainable development, promoting environmental stewardship and leading to climate action.
The circular homes concept enabled a practical demonstration of how climate change is caused from household activities. Through the activities of the workshop, each individual draws a picture of their home, gains an understanding of heat gains with respect to the solar path and layout, and can then apply passive strategies to improve thermal comfort based on the research findings reported by Gooroochurn et al. (2021). Participants also reflect on how rainwater run-off is channelled and can then seek ways to either harvest the run-off or find means to percolate into the ground. Potential solid waste management solutions can be achieved by practising segregation at household level, and subsequently by working with other members of the community, social enterprises and recycling companies. Government and private sector support are needed for the practical implementation of circular homes around Mauritius as pilot studies to demonstrate the climate action benefits.
Ballard, J., Borden, L. & Perkins, D.F. (2021). Program quality components related to youth civic engagement. Children and Youth Services Review, 126, 106022.
Godsmark, C.N. (2022). An igniter for personal climate action? Journal of Climate Change and Health, 6, 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2022.100133
Gooroochurn, M., Coret, J.Y., Brown, N., Venkannah, S. & Wright, A. (2021). Assessing the efficacy of passive measures for the tropical context of Mauritius through parametric simulations and in-situ measurement. CIBSE 2021 Technical Symposium, 13-14 July 2021.
Gooroochurn, M. (2022). Circular homes – an energy-water-materials nexus for community climate engagement and action at grassroots level in the built environment. Results in Engineering, 15, 100548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100548
MacDonald, J.P., Harper, S.L., Willox, A.C., Edge, V.L. & Rigolet Inuit Community Government. (2013). A necessary voice: climate change and lived experiences of youth in Rigolet, Nunatsiavut, Canada. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 360-371.
Singh, P., Tabe, T. & Martin, T. (2022). The role of women in community resilience to climate change: a case study of an Indigenous Fijian community. Women's Studies International Forum, 90, 102550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102550
Vyas, S., Khatri-Chhetri, A., Aggarwal, P., Thornton, P. & Campbell, B.M. (2022). Perspective: Tthe gap between intent and climate action in agriculture. Global Food Security, 32, 100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100612.
Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets
L Hvid Horup, P K Ohms, M Hauschild, S R B Gummidi, A Q Secher, C Thuesen, M Ryberg
Equity and justice in urban coastal adaptation planning: new evaluation framework
T Okamoto & A Doyon
Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation
T Comelli, M Pelling, M Hope, J Ensor, M E Filippi, E Y Menteşe & J McCloskey
Suburban climate adaptation governance: assumptions and imaginaries affecting peripheral municipalities
L Cerrada Morato
Urban shrinkage as a catalyst for transformative adaptation
L Mabon, M Sato & N Mabon
Maintaining a city against nature: climate adaptation in Beira
J Schubert
Ventilation regulations and occupant practices: undetectable pollution and invisible extraction
J Few, M Shipworth & C Elwell
Nature for resilience reconfigured: global- to-local translation of frames in Africa
K Rochell, H Bulkeley & H Runhaar
How hegemonic discourses of sustainability influence urban climate action
V Castán Broto, L Westman & P Huang
Fabric first: is it still the right approach?
N Eyre, T Fawcett, M Topouzi, G Killip, T Oreszczyn, K Jenkinson & J Rosenow
Gender and the heat pump transition
J Crawley, F Wade & M de Wilde
Social value of the built environment [editorial]
F Samuel & K Watson
Understanding demolition [editorial]
S Huuhka
Data politics in the built environment [editorial]
A Karvonen & T Hargreaves
European building passports: developments, challenges and future roles
M Buchholz & T Lützkendorf
Decision-support for selecting demolition waste management strategies
M van den Berg, L Hulsbeek & H Voordijk
Assessing social value in housing design: contributions of the capability approach
J-C Dissart & L Ricaurte
Electricity consumption in commercial buildings during Covid-19
G P Duggan, P Bauleo, M Authier, P A Aloise-Young, J Care & D Zimmerle
Disruptive data: historicising the platformisation of Dublin’s taxi industry
J White & S Larsson
Impact of 2050 tree shading strategies on building cooling demands
A Czekajlo, J Alva, J Szeto, C Girling & R Kellett
Social values and social infrastructures: a multi-perspective approach to place
A Legeby & C Pech
Resilience of racialized segregation is an ecological factor: Baltimore case study
S T A Pickett, J M Grove, C G Boone & G L Buckley
Latest Commentaries
Time to Question Demolition!
André Thomsen (Delft University of Technology) comments on the recent Buildings & Cities special issue ‘Understanding Demolition’ and explains why this phenomenon is only beginning to be understood more fully as a social and behavioural set of issues. Do we need an epidemiology of different demolition rates?
Where are Women of Colour in Urban Planning?
Safaa Charafi asks: is it possible to decolonialise the planning profession to create more inclusive and egalitarian urban settings? It is widely accepted that cities are built by men for other men. This male domination in urban planning results in cities that often do not adequately address challenges encountered by women or ethnic and social minorities. Although efforts are being taken to include women in urban planning, women of colour are still under-represented in many countries, resulting in cities that often overlook their needs.