
www.buildingsandcities.org/insights/commentaries/academia-climate-change.html
Providing students with the education and deep understanding of the issues and capabilities is now even more crucial
Edward
Mazria and Lindsay
Rasmussen of Architecture 2030
respond to the B&C special issue EDUCATION
& TRAINING: MAINSTREAMING ZERO CARBON. Professional design schools can provide the leadership needed
to address what is this century's greatest challenge - the preservation of a
habitable planet. Providing
students with new knowledge and capabilities is now even more critical if we are to act responsibly to stay within a 1.5˚C budget. 5 broad challenges for higher education are presented.
We are in the midst of many US and global calamities - climate change, COVID-19, and environmental, racial, and social injustices - each demanding immediate and sustained action. While 2020 has been an extremely challenging year, it has also been a year met by an increased awareness of these issues, as well as new innovations, dialog and achievements in addressing them.
Recent climate action has been motivated by accelerating global climatic impacts and an understanding of the dramatic difference between a 1.5˚C global warming limit and a 2˚C limit, and the global CO2 emission budgets (Rogelj et al., 2018) for meeting the 1.5˚C threshold. According to the IPCC, the global carbon budget, or the total amount of CO2 that can be released into the atmosphere while maintaining a good, or 67% probability, of limiting warming to 1.5˚C is now about 340 GtCO2. To meet this budget, global CO2 emissions must be reduced by 65% by 2030, and CO2 emissions completely phased out by 2040.
The good news is, if we act quickly and responsibly, we can stay within the 1.5˚C budget. We have all the tools, policies, strategies, products, and affordable renewable energy needed to do so as outlined in the International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook 2020 which tracks energy production and consumption worldwide (Carbon Brief, 2020).
Governments are beginning to address these new targets. In December 2020 the UK Prime Minister announced their new target that aligns with the IPCC SR15 report, calling for a reduction in UK's emissions by at least 68% by 2030, compared to 1990 levels (BEIS, 2020). Bold action is also being taken to address embodied carbon in construction as Oslo, Los Angeles, Mexico City, and Budapest commit to emissions reductions through the C40 Clean Construction Declaration, 'pledging to work with industry to, at a minimum, halve emissions from construction projects in their cities by 2030' (C40, 2020).
While significant action is currently underway in the profession, a paralleled action must now be accelerated within academia. Providing students with the education and deep understanding of the issues and tools they need as they enter the workforce is now even more critical.
Professional design schools are well poised to provide the leadership in higher education needed to address what we deem to be this century's greatest challenge - the preservation of a habitable planet. Schools serve as unique laboratories for structuring an integrated response to complex physical, ecological, social, and economic concerns; and they can do so at a scale that is manageable, yet large enough to make a discernible difference. Focusing on the important role and positive impact education and training plays in meeting the Paris Agreement's targets, addressing current and future climate impacts, and moving beyond zero-carbon to create Carbon Positive and socially just built environments will instill a sense of purpose and excitement in meeting the challenges of our time.
We specifically suggest that professional program core design studios immediately:
An abundance of positive examples already exist in both academia and the design professions. The Buildings & Cities special issue shows how education and training can develop 'the capacities, capabilities and competences to rapidly decarbonize both new construction and the existing building stock' (Stevenson and Kwok, 2020). Authors dive into issues of policy and cross-disciplinary collaboration, as well as passive design strategies, embodied carbon and the importance of reuse, recycling, and re-manufacturing of building products. Authors also address the need for addressing issues holistically, expanding beyond fundamentals of zero-carbon design and into social issues. We recommend using this special issue of Buildings & Cities as a stepping point for further action, collaboration, and conversations.
BEIS (2020) UK sets ambitious new climate target ahead of UN Summit. Press release from UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-sets-ambitious-new-climate-target-ahead-of-un-summit
Carbon Brief (2020). Solar is now 'cheapest electricity in history', confirms IEA. https://www.carbonbrief.org/solar-is-now-cheapest-electricity-in-history-confirms-iea
C40 Cities (2020) Oslo, Los Angeles, Mexico City and Budapest Commit to Clean Construction, Moving the Industry Towards a Sustainable Future. Press release from C40 Cities. https://www.c40.org/press_releases/clean-construction-declaration-launch
Rogelj, J., D. Shindell, K. Jiang, S. Fifita, P. Forster, V. Ginzburg, C. Handa, H. Kheshgi, S. Kobayashi, E. Kriegler, L. Mundaca, R. Séférian, and M.V.Vilariño (2018). Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. Geneva: IPCC and WMO. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
Stevenson, F., & Kwok, A. (2020). Mainstreaming zero carbon: lessons for built-environment education and training. Buildings and Cities, 1(1), pp. 687-696., p. 687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.84
Critical Reconstruction Theory and the invention of post-disaster response
G Lizarralde, D Wachsmuth, F Özdoğan & M Cossu
Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui’s dual disaster recovery
A Y F Urushima & K Yamaguchi
Critical reflections on the process of interdisciplinary building science research
G T Morgan, M F Touchie, J Robinson, A Jakubiec & J Tran
Comparing technical disassembly potential methods for concrete and timber buildings
N Westerholm, A Tuure, S Pajunen & M Kuittinen
One-stop shops as leverage points for renovation sufficiency
G Pardalis & M Sula
Creating resilient cities: advocacy and planning for equity-based recovery
A Paidakaki
Impact of glazed balcony design on daylight in Finnish apartments
L Jegard, R Castaño-Rosa & S Pelsmakers
Climate-related risks: implications for municipal governments in Brazil
C Nastari Fernandes, P Ciminelli Ramalho & F Lima-Silva
Changing land-use metrics in mass housing: Türkiye case study
M S Çepni, A K Kutluca, T Salihoğlu, A Atmaca & S Mintemur
Personal comfort systems for adults with intellectual disabilities
K Exss, M Trebilcock, P Wegertseder-Martínez, S Schiavon & H Zhang
How buildings shape occupant movement: a systematic review and framework
G Chinazzo & N Wang
Rethinking the second life of post-disaster and post-conflict temporary housing
N Akdede, B Ö Ay & İ Gürsel Dino
Embodied carbon impacts of residential development siteworks: new assessment framework
P Comerford, O Kinnane, R O’Hegarty & P Crowe
Horizontal building extensions: potential in Finnish blocks of flats
J Tarpio & P Lehtovuori
Post-disaster reconstruction and ethics: the power of social capital
B Ubesingha, G Ofori, G Agyekum-Mensah & D Frings
Towards net zero: sectoral ambitions and global trends in building decarbonisation
C E Caballero-Güereca, J Vogel, N Alaux, C M Ouellet-Plamondon, J Silva Santana, G Foliente, T Lützkendorf & A Passer
Climate literacy and labour agency in vocational education and training
J Calvert, V Price, C Winch, L Clarke, M Sahin-Dikmen, P-L Bilodeau & E Dionne
Towards a new neighbourhood-scale climate risk-adaptation approach
C Rigoni, S Oliveira, O Romice, A Moreno-Rangel & A Chatzimichali
Sharing energy renovations know-how through citizen–professional knowledge networks
C Foulds, S Royston, A Aggeli, A Crowther & R Robison
Environmental impacts of reclaimed bricks: comparing different deconstruction methods
E Salmio & S Huuhka
eCOMBINE: framework for energy, comfort, behaviour and a multi-domain environment
V M Barthelmes, C Karmann, V Gonzalez Serrano, K Lyu, J Wienold, M Andersen, D Licina & D Khovalyg
Living labs as ‘agents for change’ [editorial]
N Antaki, D Petrescu & V Marin
Post-disaster reconstruction: infill housing prototypes for Kathmandu
J Bolchover & K Mundle
Urban verticalisation: typologies of high-rise development in Santiago
D Moreno-Alba, C Marmolejo-Duarte, M Vicuña del Río & C Aguirre-Núñez
A public theatre as a living lab to create resilience
A Apostu & M Drăghici
Reconstruction in post-war Rome: transnational flows and national identity
J Jiang
Reframing disaster recovery through spatial justice: an integrated framework
M A Gasseloğlu & J E Gonçalves

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.
We will not share your email with third parties. Read more
Latest Commentaries
Disaster Reconstruction: Rebuilding Trust in Fragile States
Tania N. Haddad and Tracy Sakr explain why effective disaster response in fragile institutional environments depends not only on resources but also on governance capacity, coordination mechanisms and institutional trust. The 2020 Beirut Port explosion shows that fragmented governance authority, non-binding coordination arrangements and low public trust resulted in duplicated efforts, uneven aid distribution and limited strategic recovery planning. Institutional reforms can strengthen state capacity, formalise coordination mechanisms between government and civil society, and rebuild trust through transparency and accountability.
Reimagining Climate Action, Community Engagement and Professional Responsibility
Climate change poses a plethora of challenges for decision- and policy-making on multiple scales. Adopting a risk perspective can identify multiple kinds of risk that must be addressed if climate action is to be successful. John Robinson and Emily Smit (University of Toronto), Pamela Robinson (Toronto Metropolitan University) and Anne Gloger (Catalysts’ Circle) consider the decision-making risks having to do with whether climate mitigation and adaptation policies and programs are likely to achieve their goals.