Welcome to the B&C COMMUNITY WEBSITE | Visit the B&C JOURNAL WEBSITE

www.buildingsandcities.org/phd-video-awards/winners-video-challenge.html

AWARDS! 2022 PhD Video Challenge

AWARDS! 2022 PhD Video Challenge

Collectively and individually, all the videos are a rich celebration of emerging, next generation built environment research.

Congratulations to the all the entrants of the "Why it Matters" Video Challenge who displayed creativity, vitality and good communication skills to explain the significance of their research. The judges were impressed and persuaded us to award 9 prizes.  In addition, a further prize was decided by the People's Vote.  And the 10 awards for the 2022 Video Challenge go to....

OUTSTANDING VIDEOS (€600)

Dalia ALY  
University of Strathclyde
Cairo Green Spaces

Marta SMEKTALA
Wrocław University of Science and Technology
Why Balconies Matter   


EXCELLENT VIDEOS (€400)

Vera GÖTZE
University of Bern
Why It Matters: Comparing Patterns of Densification

Anna CONZATTI
University of Bath
Improving Shelter Design for Saving Lives

Freya WISE
Open University
Realistically Reducing Carbon While Retaining Heritage in Residential Buildings

Kadir KURU
Istanbul Technical University
Model Proposal for Effective Risk Management in Public Private Partnerships

Jonna LJUNGE
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
Aggregates: The Hidden Foundation of Our Modern Society

Aditi BISEN
CEPT University
Wastewater Transitions in the Global South: Pollutant to Resource

Ahmad ALADAWI
Loughborough University
They May Forget Us, But Never We Will!


PEOPLE'S VOTE prize (€400)

Mark COLLETT
Leeds Beckett University
How Can QUB Keep Us On Track for Net Zero?


Thank you!

First and foremost, our deep thanks to the 49 participants studying in 14 countries (AU, DE, IN, IT, IE, MY, NG, NZ, PL, CH, TR, UK, US) who invested much time, thought and energy to create a 2-minute video explaining the implications of their PhD.  A formidable task!  We are enriched by all your efforts to share your emerging research that will undoubtedly shape our future.  And we hope this process helped you to hone your communication skills and strategies. Each of you have created a unique description that conveys much about your thinking and your approach to life.

The Outstanding and Excellent videos were selected by a diverse group of 7 judges (Richard Lorch, Andreas Klee, Chiara Tagliaro, Vanesa Castán Broto, Rajan Rawal, Michael Donn & Rick Diamond). Thank you for watching all the videos and your rich feedback.  

As of 15.11.2022, there were over 13,000 views of the videos - clearly a strong interest in this content. Over 2,200 people from 59 countries voted in the People's Vote. Thank you for your participation and enthusiasm.

The Video Challenge was developed by Buildings & Cities (B&C) and the Academy for Territorial Development in the Leibniz Association (ARL). We extend our thanks to our steering group: Richard Lorch (B&C), Andreas Klee (ARL), Chiara Tagliaro (Politecnico di Milano), Rajan Rawal (CEPT University), Rick Diamond (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Freddie Paige (Virginia Tech) and Carolin Plienes (ARL).

2022 Video Challenge Gallery
Previous article
2022 Video Challenge Gallery

Latest Peer-Reviewed Journal Content

Journal Content

Urban form metrics for building occupancy modelling: applications and impacts
D Reiter, M Jehling & R Hecht

Retrofit realism: affordable low-carbon policies for existing homes
N Eyre & R Khosla

Inside offsite: everyday dwelling in factory-built apartments
L Dorignon & R Horne

MMC for housing: sectoral perception on governance challenges
J Morgan, C Goodier, R Schmidt-III & K Ayinla

Reorganising specification practice for component reuse: an exploratory study
S Gao, K Jones, J Xu & J Glass

Kitchen retrofits to support food practices and wellbeing
F J Andrews, A Sal Moslehian, E Warner & R Tucker

From strategy to delivery: a comparative analysis of MMC roadmaps
G Goldman, D Sorokine, F Suerich-Gulick, C Carbone & M Jemtrud

Thermal comfort, ventilation and mosquito-borne disease risk in Zanzibar hospitals
O Sloan Wood, J B Knudsen, K L Schiøler, E Lupenza, M Msellem & F Saleh

Reusing precast concrete elements in construction: assessing the economic conditions
O Vigren, H Westerlind & T Malmqvist

Institutional readiness for industrialised social housing in Vietnam
T Q Nguyen, B N Nguyen, T H Q To & Z Aziz

Prefabrication for housing retrofit: governance, innovation and resident experience
E Pikas, K Kuusk, P Pihelo, R Liias, J Pukk & T Kalamees

Reframing heat pump transitions: a care perspective
J van der Haer, R Schelwald & F de Haan

Urban informal settlements in Africa: transforming adaptation governance
K Buyana & H Sseviiri

Reusing concrete products in indoor environments: chemical hazard assessment
K Tähtinen, A Helin, E Parshintsev & H Hovi

Negotiating net-zero carbon: an ANT analysis of two buildings
L Schweber & M Green

Design for disassembly: a review of public policy proposals
O Vorobjev, U Uotila, T Joensuu & A Saari

Retrofitting Norwegian residential buildings: an archetype-based dynamic stock model
L S A Rousseau, S Amini, S Akin & E G Hertwich

Decolonising time: vernacular villages and the politics of heritage temporality
R Al-Rabady

Commutes to alternative workplaces: GHG emissions and physical activity
J Taylor, L Thoen, A Espinosa Mireles De Villafranca, P Anashin, J Vanhatalo, D Milián Bernal & I Okkonen

Nine ‘myths’ about the building stock of Great Britain
S Evans, P Steadman, A Neto-Bradley, D Humphrey, R Liddiard,H Shamsi, J Palmer & G Simons


See all peer reviewed articles

Latest Commentaries

Photo: Andrew Belfield

Living labs are blossoming more than ever. Their first appearances in academic literature were roughly 25 years ago. Dimitri Schuurman (Ghent University) responds to the recent Buildings & Cities special issue “Living Labs: Agents for Change” and focuses on two important drawbacks that also come with living labs booming in practice as well as in the literature.

MSc students undertaking BPE at UCL's Environmental Design & Engineering programme.

Building performance evaluation (BPE) is a process to understand how buildings perform in use and how inhabitants interact with their buildings. BPE can harness these insights to improve building design, operation and use. Paradoxically, BPE is rarely part of the curriculum for education of designers, buildings and managers. Fionn Stevenson (independent scholar) considers why BPE / post-occupancy evaluation is not being taught to architecture students in the UK and how to mainstream BPE in education and practice.

Join Our Community

Join Our Community

The most important part of any journal is our people – readers, authors, reviewers, editorial board members and editors. You are cordially invited to join our community by joining our mailing list. We send out occasional emails about the journal – calls for papers, special issues, events and more.

We will not share your email with third parties. Read more